Brighton Bypass
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article contains information about a planned or expected future road. It may contain information of a speculative nature and the content may change as the road's construction or completion approaches and more information becomes available. |
The Brighton Bypass is a proposed bypass of the Midland Highway between Granton and Bagdad, just north of Hobart in southern Tasmania. The original concept is over 2 decades old and includes both the replacement of the Bridgewater Bridge, and the bypassing of Bridgewater, Brighton, Pontville and Bagdad.
This current section of the Midland Highway is a 2 lane road with no overtaking lanes. The speed limit slows to as low as 50km/h in the area of a Brighton school. Residents of the area have come to dread the almost daily sound of an ambulance speeding past, or a helicopter flying above, towards another crash.[1] Hobart Disc jockey and resident of Bagdad, Bob Cooke has said locals live in "mortal fear" driving down Constitution Hill - A semi-mountainous stretch of the highway.[2]
The University of Tasmania is currently spending $10 thousand a month subsidising bus travel for students between the Hobart and Launceston Campus. This subsidy started after four students died in a car accident on the Midland Highway in 2006[3].
Contents |
[edit] Background
The proposal has been slow going and plagued by political bickering. In 2001 the Federal Government set aside $100 million towards the replacement of the bridge[4] after the State and Federal governments reached consensus on the replacement bridge's location. In 2003 the Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources declared the Bridgewater crossing as the highest priority issue for the National Highway in Tasmania. They also said that a range of upgrading concepts has been developed and were investigating costs for the construction of a new bridge compared to the costs of a refurbishment for the existing bridge.[5]
In 2005 the Federal Minister for Trade Warren Truss said the state government had accepted all funding packages proposed by AusLink for that year except for the replacement of the Bridgewater Bridge. He said this is because the state Government does not want that project to proceed[6]
On October 30, 2006 a problem with the lifting span of the Bridgewater bridge forced its closure for several weeks causing traffic problems for commuters in Northern Hobart. After this incident and the increasing road fatalities on the existing highway the Derwent Valley, Brighton and the Southern Midlands Council started lobbying the State government for the construction of the long awaited bypass. Shortly after this, on November 13, 2006 the Federal Minister for Roads Jim Lloyd said the Tasmanian Government had taken too long to find a solution to problems with the Bridgewater Bridge. Mr Lloyd said there is $20 million available for a new bridge and the Federal Government is open to approaches for more funding. He said it is unacceptable that Tasmania's Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources has spent five years looking at alternatives for the bridge.[7]
[edit] Current proposal
[edit] Draft Proposal
During early April 2007, after a ten year old girl was killed on the highway, the Mayors of the 3 southern councils proposed a 10 year upgrade of Hobart's northern approaches ending in the replacement of the Bridgewater Bridge.[8] Southern Midlands Council Mayor Tony Bisdee estimated the staged works would cost between $250 million and $300 million and would help the South "catch up in road funding to the North and North-West of the state".[8] Towards the end of April 2007, after five road fatalities on the Highway that month[9] the state government drafted plans for a two-lane bypass of Brighton (built over 10 years).[10] The plan involves the following upgrades (in order of completion):[10]
- Minor improvements of the Lyell Highway at the southern end of the Bridgewater bridge.
- The southern section of the Brighton Bypass
- The northern section of the Bypass from Brighton to Pontville, then on to Bagdad
- The approaches to the Bridgewater Bridge.
This new proposal did not include the replacement of the Bridgewater Bridge or overtaking lanes for the new bypass. Mayor Bisdee said that the proposed 2 lane bypass was inadequate for the needs of the area, and stated that with increasing truck movements in the area, that overtaking lanes were needed or the Swedish One Plus Two model. State Transport Minister Jim Cox has confirmed that specific details such as lanes, safety barriers and other safety features were yet to be finalised.[10] Mr Cox stressed the road on the bridge is sound but did say $1.5 million was needed to fix the liftspan.[8]
[edit] Political Problems
“ | We have waited far too long for a Commonwealth commitment to southern Tasmania. Since 2000, The Federal government has spent more than $90 million on roads in the north-west and only $10 million on roads in the south. | ” |
—Paul Lennon, The Mercury[11] |
Former Premier Paul Lennon joined the debate, saying that the upgrade—which will bypass some of Tasmania's most neglected and dangerous stretches of highway—was long overdue.[12] He said he along with all other southern Tasmanians wanted to see the national highway upgraded significantly. The fomer Premier also said he hopes the proposed move of the Freight Terminal to Brighton will be a catalyst for federal funds to fix Hobart's northern approaches.[12] The day after making these comments the Mr Lennon accused the Federal government of pork-barrelling in the north and north-west while neglecting deadly roads in the south.
“ | Well, I think when an assessment is made in a few months time that people will draw a conclusion that it is a fair balance. I do remind Mr Lennon that 60 per cent of Tasmania's budget is provided by the Commonwealth already. | ” |
—John Howard, The Mercury[13] |
In the following days Prime minister John Howard indicated the state's south will get a boost in road funding. However, Mr Howard hit back at Premier Paul Lennon's accusations he has spent up big in north and north-west while neglecting road safety in the south of the state.
The State Government had not yet released it's plans for the proposed bypass to the Federal government, Mr Lennon said this should not prevent a commitment. He said that the $60 million East Tamar Highway upgrade announced in 2006 had not required a plan.[13]
[edit] Bridgewater Bridge
Shortly after this the Lennon government announced that the Bridewater Bridge would be closed indefinitely to boating traffic. They stated the reason for this was the $2 million price tag to fix the lifting mechanism was out of the state governments reach.[14] Infrastructure Minister Jim Cox also verified that taking all of these expenses into account, the bridge costs the tax payer $12,000 each time the bridge is lifted.[14] The local boating community expressed anger that the bridge would be closed to Boating Traffic.[14] Some of the boat users went as far as to say the State government had treated them with contempt.[14] Senator Eric Abetz stated that the governments decision to keep the bridge closed to boating traffic showed it should have pursued a new bridge over the Derwent River.[15] Senator Abetz said the state government had been dishonest with the southern mayors.
“ | We have been told by premiers Rundle, Bacon and Lennon that the bridge was the top priority for road works in Tasmania, it was absolutely vital because the current one did not have a long life left. All of a sudden they (the present state government) came up with an engineer's report which suggested it had another 25 years life in it. Clearly this is wrong. We now have all sorts of problems with that bridge. It's a pity, we could have been two years down the path of building this bridge if the state government and mayors hadn't backed off[15] — Eric Abetz |
” |
Around the same time, Derwent Valley Mayor Nick Cracknell suggested the state government could be "fudging" figures on repairing the lifting mechanism of the bridge in an effort to convince the public that its repair was too costly. He proposed an independent assessment of bridge. [16]
[edit] Official Plan
During the last days of May 2007 the State Government released its long awaited plan for Hobart's northern approaches.[17] The plan outlines a $146 million four-lane grade separated highway to bypass Brighton. As well as having a continuous 110 km/h speed limit the new road will also have a centre barrier to stop head-on crashes that have caused numerous deaths and serious injuries on the notorious two-lane stretch of the Midland Highway. The five year plan also includes the construction of a $70 million Brighton transport hub to replace the road-rail freight transfer centre at the Hobart railyards. The Bridgewater bridge will get a $12 million repair to make it last until a new bridge can be built as part of the $200 million stage two of the plan, which should happen by 2017. The 12 km Pontville-Bagdad bypass will be built as part of stage two from 2011.[17] The big difference to the official plan compared to the government's draft plan released a month earlier is the Bridgewater Bridge. Possibly due to community outrage over the present bridge being closed to boat traffic, the official plan includes it's eventual replacement.
[edit] References
- ^ "Tragic road to our ruin", The Mercury. Retrieved on 2007-05-03.
- ^ "Constitution Hill 'a joke'", The Mercury. Retrieved on 2007-05-03.
- ^ "Student highway safety demand", The Mercury. Retrieved on 2007-05-04.
- ^ Bridgewater Bridge Transcript. Stateline Tasmania (2005). Retrieved on 2007-04-28.
- ^ Output Group 1. Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources (2003). Retrieved on 2007-04-29.
- ^ Mr Green Should Get Aboard The 'Funding Express'. AusLink (2005). Retrieved on 2007-04-28.
- ^ Bridgewater Bridge delays unacceptable, says Minister. ABC news online (2006). Retrieved on 2007-04-28.
- ^ a b c "Push for bypass grows", The Mercury. Retrieved on 2007-04-19.
- ^ "Woman dies in highway horror", The Mercury. Retrieved on 2007-04-28.
- ^ a b c "Bypass plan lacks lanes", The Mercury. Retrieved on 2007-04-27.
- ^ "Lennon Hits Coalition", The Mercury. Retrieved on 2007-05-02.
- ^ a b "Road To Federal Funding", The Mercury. Retrieved on 2007-05-01.
- ^ a b "Hint at roads funding in south", The Mercury. Retrieved on 2007-05-04.
- ^ a b c d "Bridge over troubled water", The Mercury. Retrieved on 2007-05-17.
- ^ a b "Bridge stand broadside", The Mercury. Retrieved on 2007-05-18.
- ^ "Mayor sees bridge "fudging"", The Mercury. Retrieved on 2007-05-23.
- ^ a b "$280m death road bypass", The Mercury. Retrieved on 2007-05-31.
|