User talk:Bretwolfe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What was that weird list you put on my talk page? You referenced the Advocate Oct 9th issue (what year???!); what is this regarding? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roz Lipschitz (talk • contribs)

Contents

[edit] Your question

An honest answer: First, from what I've seen, you shouldn't even have a bio in Wikipedia. See WP:PORNBIO. Secondly, what is in your Wikipedia bio isn't your problem. See WP:Autobiography, especially, "The problem with autobiographies." Thirdly, just some friendly advice: go out and do something with your life. Become a notable person, and others will write your biography. Or just lead a good life and don't worry about being famous. It ain't all that.

I recognize that the standards are at the present time inconsistent, but the direction Wikipedia is going is towards getting rid of some of the non-notable bios. Sourcing is not the issue in your case. Your future plans are not relevant to Wikipedia. Your blog and myspace and official site are not relevant to Wikipedia. The only thing that's relevant at the moment is your acting, and I don't think your accomplishments rise to the level of notability at this time. What's acceptable? Something that is written about you in a reliable source--not a database you can add things in for yourself. Did a newspaper or magazine write an article about your acting in a film? Did TV Guide profile you, or your show, and mention you in some important way? These are the kinds of things that make a bio notable. -Jmh123 23:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:BretWolfe2006.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:065 65.JPG. The copy called Image:065 65.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 23:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:BretWolfe2006.JPG

hi did you take this pic?Genisock2 (talk) 22:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:BretWolfe2006.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:BretWolfe2006.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Genisock2 (talk) 12:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)