Talk:Brett Phillips

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
Flag
Portal
Brett Phillips is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Australia because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WP Australia}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WP Australia}} template, removing {{WP Australia}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Weasel words

"Believed to be" - please clear up as per Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words. Essexmutant 15:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

I'm gonna do what you could just easily have done - delete the entire phrase. Rumour and speculation of that sort can be deleted on sight. --kingboyk 21:27, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, as I read it the preference is to cite the reasons behind the belief. (from Wikipedia: Avoid Weasel Words: "It's better to put a name and a face on an opinion than to assign an opinion to an anonymous source.") Therefore I left it for someone more familiar with the subject than myself to do so. Essexmutant 21:51, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Moot point, as they often are. We do the best we can :) --kingboyk 01:22, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

dont delete this page it has now been fixed up.. Shapot 02:46, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Actually mate, it hasn't. I would contend it shouldn't be deleted but we need some more information on the background of his career. Rogerthat 08:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC)