Talk:Brendan Joseland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Flag
Portal
Brendan Joseland is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports.
cricket ball Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability
Brendan Joseland is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

The page has significant content and should not be deleted by any means. Please remove the note suggesting this.

Contents

[edit] Please Remove the Speedy Deletion Tag

Please remove the speedy deletion tag. The tag was added when the piece was a work in progress and as it is now completed it is particuarly long and obviously no longer a candidate for speedy deletion

[edit] interesting

i would reccomend keeping this entry

[edit] Why does the content on this page keep getting deleted

I will stop putting it back together if someone can give me a valid reason as to why it keeps getting converted to a stub

I think all encyclopedia articles should be as detailed as possible, it's unfair to compare the article to say, Shane Watson who might not have as much information. It's like with footy articles, Alan Didak has more info than a legend of the game, Bob Pratt. Is it right? No. It means Pratt should have more info, not Didak should have less. Rogerthat Talk 00:21, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 17:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)