Talk:Bremen-Vegesack

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Germany Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

[edit] camp

sorry, your refs pls ? in farge, in blumenthal direct, in bremen city, at deschimag, finndorf missler neuenland ... and ... and ... serveral more

don't delete because "it is somply wrong" give me referneces please -- Sebastian scha. (talk) 07:47, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi Sebastian ,
sorry that I was mislead. The only relevant subcamp I thought of was the U-Boot-Bunker Valentin in Blumenthal (Rekum, to be precise), which was not only a shelter, but a building for site submarines, too. The subcamp you´ve mentioned existed as one of approx. 100 for Neuengamme, and being one of 1634 total, all figures according to the sources you´ve mentioned. So, my editing remark "It´s simply wrong" was wrong. But the reason why I was wrong is still there: the Vegesack subcamp was not at all as important as the Bunker camp was. For that reason, it doesn´t belong in the article. I should have put that on the talk page rather than reverting, that´s right, and has happened now. Greetings, --Joachim Weckermann (talk) 09:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi Joachim, I answered on your talk. It is very complicated to find informations about these subcamps and severeal webpage are combining them at all. If I found more information (sources), I will expand it or delete the entry myself immediately. -- Sebastian scha. (talk) 09:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)