Talk:Bread machine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 08:57, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Requested Move

  • Talk:BreadmakerBreadmakerBread machine – The title 'breadmaker' is misleading and incorrect; a breadmaker is defined as an individual who professionally bakes bread. The appropriate page title should be Bread machine, which is an electronic appliance which creates dough and processes it on a prespecified schedule. I accidentally cut-and-paste moved it, and was chastised, so I'm turning here. —Asarkees 00:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~

[edit] Voting

  • I absolutely support this move. Breadmaker is ambiguous at best. The title reads like it refers to a person, not a machine. The content should be moved to Bread machine and then this page should be a disambig to direct either to bread machine or baker. Dave 00:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
I support the move and especially the disambig, since I know there are some, like me, that call it breadmaker, though bread machine is more correct. Verne Equinox 01:00, 22 February 2006 (UTC).
  • Comment : For sake of clarity, suggest "Breadmaking machine" rather than "Bread machine" (and include something like "(sometimes known as a '''breadmaker''', although this usually refers to a person)" in the first sentence) ...?  Regards, David Kernow 15:15, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
It just seems weird to list the page at a name that is not used to describe it for clarity's sake. I know that sounded muddled, but i think that I'm trying to say is that factual accuracy should be more important than having an unwieldy, heavily explicative title. We don't list "hat" at "piece of headgear used for decorative or functional purposes," y'know? It's a hat, and we list it at hat. Asarkees 18:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Another possibility: "Breadmaker (machine)". I think that's what I'd support. Best wishes, David Kernow 18:32, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
The whole point of this discussion was to make "breadmaker" not be conflated with "bread machine," though. Asarkees 03:15, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

[edit] Unnecessary template?

The otheruses template is probably unnecessary after the move. While Breadmaker and baker could be confused, it is unlikely that a person would confuse bread machine with baker. Opinions? 206.53.24.182 23:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC) Sorry, just noticed a redirect. Wouldn't a template that says "Breadmaker redirects here. For a person that bakes bread, see baker" or something similar be more applicable? I think there is a template for that, but I don't know it. 206.53.24.182 23:08, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I've replaced the otheruses4 template with {{redirect}}. Graham87 10:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)