Talk:BRD Trilogy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.
This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. A possibility for American films from before 1964 would be a screenshot from the trailer, as these are now in the public domain. Please make sure fair use is properly observed, or the image will be removed. See WP:Films MOS for image guidelines and assistance in uploading.

[edit] Merging

Okay, I've merged the old articles BRD (film) and The BRD Trilogy and placed them here (and moved the "FilmsWikiProject" tag above from The BRD Trilogy). I still think there might be some cleaning up to be done. Does anyone have a source to cite for the statement that Fassbinder wanted to make a BRD4? --metzerly 04:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 04:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


This article should be renamed to BRD (film series) to bring it inline with the naming convention pertaining to film series. Let's discuss. - LA @ 10:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Please state whether or not you support the renaming of this article.

  • Oppose - BRD Trilogy is established name for this series, and was named as such by the director. To change it simply for the sake of following a Wikipedia convention would be inaccurate. — WiseKwai 12:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.