User talk:Bravedave

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Enigma (yacht). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Enigma (yacht). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Enigma (yacht), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copied from User talk:FisherQueen

You wrote: Fisherqueen, I am puzzled as to why I have been blocked after warning me that my last change was bias. The warning stated that I would be blocked if I continued to re-post the information, I did not. Instead I contacted you after reading your Neutral point of view policy and offered to re-word my post. This seems a little harsh, after all I've never shown any malice to you or this site. Bravedave 00:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, I'm not FQ but in the interest of getting you a quick answer I'll try to field this one. I checked the block log and don't see that you've been blocked. All I see are a couple of warnings to your talk page, but no official action taken. I'll copy this to your talk page so that you see it. Philippe 02:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)