Talk:Braves Field

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag
Portal
Braves Field is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of baseball and baseball-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Boston; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Very interesting piece, but methinks this page could do with a bit of redecorating... ~ Ross (ElCharismo) 19:39, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

  • If nothing else, the dimensions chronology is virtually unreadable. It could be simplied, methinks. Wahkeenah 19:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merger proposal?

It could be done. There should be plenty of material between the two. The question is... which one do you redirect to the other? Probably to the current structures. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 04:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Disagree. Two different types of structures for two different purposes. Best to leave separate, and avoid any confusion, esp over which name should take precedence. - BillCJ 20:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
That's not strictly true, as there was and is noticeable overlap. However, on reflection, I think they are different enough to warrant retaining the separate articles. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 20:37, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

On a side note, a merge tag should be placed on both articles and not just the Braves Field article. -Zomic13 05:58, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I forgot to remove it after BBug's last comment. It's gone now. - BillCJ 07:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I should've looked at the dates of the discussion...didn't notice that this ended a month and a half ago! :P -Zomic13 09:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)