Talk:Braunston Cleves or Fawcliff
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Archaeology, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
[edit] Braunston Cleves
Hello again RHaworth
Please change this page back to its original designation. I have done my research on this matter and there is no definitive correct name. On the OS map the name of the site is Fawcliff (see the Map on) [1] but that two has the other name on it. Local records show the settlements by both names.Stavros1 (talk) 20:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Dont worry, I have redirected the page myselfStavros1 (talk) 21:21, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- I think this policy statement is clear enough: we put the article on one of the names and use redirects for the others. However, since moving articles about seems a pointless exercise (providing the redirects exist), I will let you have your way. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 00:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- I have noted your comments and agree that in the case, for example, a welsh place name, (i.e. WREXHAM or Welsh GWRECSAM) where the name may be in the native designation and also have a British/English name then what you point out is appropriate but I think this example should be used as an exception to the rule as the name has never been agreed, and the two names are different and not a translation or native name. Thank you for your impute and interest in this page.Stavros1 (talk) 14:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
