Talk:Bratfest at Tiffany's
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives |
/Archive 1 |
[edit] Fix
Fix please. Gryffon (talk) 02:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- I really apologize for the way people have been writing here; I've been reverting edits since the dawn of this page! I assure you, I'm putting a bigger watch on this :) BlackPearl14Hermione Granger's Muggle Alias 02:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] NOTE TO ALL EDITORS OF THIS PAGE
Please don't write in your own reviews, your name, and your "plots." They don't sound at all like ENCYCLOPEDIC ENTRIES, more or less, they sound like papers by third-graders. Keep in mind that people expect a high class article, and DEFINITELY not something like this. "Ah-mazing" is an example of a word that is NOT tolerated within this article. Enough said on that. Now I understand that you're all writing in good faith, so I don't mind constructive edits. But please, don't stretch it to something that's useless, or it will be reverted. Thanks.BlackPearl14Hermione Granger's Muggle Alias 01:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Too long, didn't read
Not having read this article yet, the paragraphs are too long, just for starters.Newbyguesses - Talk 02:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I didn't write them, and I have to agree. I'm going to write a more refined, clearer article after I can properly source, summarize, and define the book. I apologize about how this page will look from now on with others somehow...messing it up now and then... BlackPearl14Hermione Granger's Muggle Alias 04:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- In general, plot summaries don't have to be sourced. As long as the summary isn't a copyright violation, it's understood that the source of the plot is the book itself. For An Angel (talk) 17:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- That's all fine, but my only other issue is that all of the reviews here looked like those written by, say, a third-grader (personal reviews e.g. "I loved this ah-mazing book") and in addition, it looks like a "character" wrote them (e.g. word usage such as "ah-mazing" or "LBR," etc.) It gets to a point where it REALLY is annoying. If people wouldn't write like this, it'd be fine.
- In general, plot summaries don't have to be sourced. As long as the summary isn't a copyright violation, it's understood that the source of the plot is the book itself. For An Angel (talk) 17:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
I agree with BlackPearl. And also, at the end, it says "this was the best book." Ummm....I thought these articles were supposed to be NEUTRAL? This article needs some serious cleanup.
-
-
-
- Oh my gosh! I completely agree with you! I hate all the made up words. --66.56.215.64 (talk) 17:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- See, already a response to the annoyance. Please tone the article down a bit more. Thanks! (winks) BlackPearl14Pirate Lord-ess 05:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh my gosh! I completely agree with you! I hate all the made up words. --66.56.215.64 (talk) 17:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
Uh, guys, if you don't like the words don't read it. In The Clique they are words and this is an article about The Clique... ~Haley
- Sorry, Haley, but this is Wikipedia, not a Clique fan page. BlackPearl14The Adventuress 18:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)