Talk:Brandon Wilson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] References
- this article is borderline vanity article without proper references for verifiability. If these could be added in a references or external links section that would make this piece more encyclopedic, esp. if the creator of this article (and most of the edits) would sign up to Wikipedia and actually log in.
- Also may have to double check qualification under WP:BIO, although probably this individual qualifies.
Santaduck 00:00, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
- added references for verifiability, per Santaduck request. These were supplied earlier and deleted by someone. Am currently logged in and am the creator of this article and the publisher of these works. Bio for author is supplied by him.Pelegrinotrek 00:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vanity
- Article appears to be by author, or an acquaintance, as all edits of the related (presumably dynamic) IPs are only on three articles: the author, and an article each for two of his publications-- otherwise the editor is not a wikipedian.
- therefore also violates the no original research rule of Wikipedia
- consider for afd as vanity article/self-promotionSantaduck 09:05, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
- added references for verifiability, per Santaduck request. These were supplied earlier and deleted by someone. Am currently logged in and am the creator of this article and the publisher of these works. Bio for author is supplied by him.Pelegrinotrek 00:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- I removed the reviews again. A quote is fine, but adding the entire review is a copyright violation. As the publisher of the books of the authors, it is difficult for you to be neutral, and your additions look to me more like advertising than an encyclopedia. Please restrain yourself more, the article may still be listed for deletion. -- Chris 73 | Talk 08:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)