Talk:Bradford fire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bradford fire article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Disaster management      (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. WikiProject Fire service      (Rated Start-Class) Fire Portal Bradford fire is part of WikiProject Fire Service, which collaborates on fire service-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. Assessment comments The following comments were left by the assessors: (edit · refresh) . Switch existing references to use one of the {{Cite}} templates Requires copy edit for WP:MOS Keith D (talk) 11:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC) Suggested article edit guidelines: To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification. After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there. Bradford WikiProject (Rated Start-Class) This article is supported by the Bradford WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the City of Bradford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the Project Page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. See comments for details. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale. WikiProject on Football     (Rated Start-Class) English football Portal The article on Bradford fire is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. This article is supported by the England task force. WikiProject Yorkshire     (Rated Start-Class) Yorkshire Portal Bradford fire is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's assessment scale. See comments for details. Low This article has been rated as Low-Priority on the Project's priority scale.
This article has an assessment summary page.

Bradford fire was supported by the football article improvement drive, a weekly collaboration to improve association football-related articles to featured article status.

Why are there links to sites that are identified as not working? What is the point? - Tigerman2005

Because various editors have decided to remove valid links or discussion that relate to any footage that exists of the event. We are not allowed to share copies of said footage, if we theoretically have it. That would be a violation of the copyright held by the news network that covered the event. Coolgamer (talk) 22:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] "A second more sinister site"

If we're not going to name the site, then is it justifiable to refer to it as "sinister"? That looks like POV to me, and I'd be inclined to edit to simply "A second site". Thoughts? Loganberry (Talk) 16:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

It's a so-called "humour" website; I removed the adjective "sinister" as a NPOV violation. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)