Talk:Brad Wardell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I had thought Bio articles should not use only the first name to reference the individual. The tone of this article may need to be reworked a bit to match other Bio articles (more impersonal and 'just the facts'). Some wording is a bit awkward too. GGG65 00:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
68.73.192.159 just added a prod, db, and speedy delete all at once, with the reason "...". I'm tempted to remove this as trolling, but I'd like someone else to look over it to confirm it's the right thing to do. No actual deletion request has been filed by the user - they just added the tags. GreenReaper 09:53, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] GGG65 Makes Some Good Points
I believe that GGG65 made some good points. The Controversy section reads like informal backyard gossip rather than an encyclopedia article. I'm tempted to delete some of these unsupported assertions but I'm willing to wait a few weeks to see if someone can come up with some reliable sources. BTW a web forum statement by a second or third party is NOT a reliable source! Regards, Bill Huffman 17:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- If you believe them to be improperly sourced then according to WP:BLP they should be removed immediately. GreenReaper 22:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- Of course, you're correct, GreenReaper. If someone has a source then they can go into the history and resurrect whatever they want and then add their reliable source reference. Thanks, Bill Huffman 01:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 2008 Update
I've taken it upon myself to begin trying to clean up this article. Any suggestions or criticisms please post here. draginol 18, May 2008 (UTC)