From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Brachypelma vagans is within the scope of WikiProject El Salvador, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on the country of El Salvador on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
|
??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spiders, a collaborative effort to improve and expand Wikipedia's coverage of spiders. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion. |
B |
This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale. |
Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
Our more experienced editors are working on the project infrastructure, classifying articles, and listing/assessing red links. You can join the project, or just check out what can be done. Your assistance is welcome!
- Clean up the article Spiders. (find "storyline", equal level of depth of information)
- Check out if pages are named correctly, eg.:
- several family pages seem to have names that only apply to a subset of the family. --Sarefo 02:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Move pictures from en:Wikipedia to WikiCommons, using this nice tool.
- Translate pages from other WPs into English
- Expand the following articles (and many, many more):
-
If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list and add your achievement to the project log.
|
Start of Talk:
[edit] Finally a "Correct" rating
Finally a correct rating that doesn't have to address length of article. I am a little critical of all the 'experts' who 'own' wikipedia. An example, the huge article on "Evolution" starts in the first sentence addressing: "Biological evolution". Eventually someone will hold their feet to the fire and rename It: "Evolution of Life", or "Biological evolution", Since there are so many other varieties of "Evolution". (Plus their ignoring Earth evolution by focussing on the (unnamed) "Biological evolution"). Anyhow... its nice to see a B rating on a shorter–type article. --from the SonoranDesert of Arizona- ..Mmcannis 02:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Better Image
I think my picture would look better in the article, but I didn't want to offend anyone, so I'm posting it here. ;-) It was taken in Mexico in 2006. --Janjan2 11:02, 23 May 2007 (UTC)