Talk:Brøndby IF

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brøndby IF article.

Article policies
Good article Brøndby IF has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
March 25, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
Flag
Portal
Brøndby IF falls within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a project to create and improve Denmark-related Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, all interested editors are welcome!

Satellite Image of Denmark

Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (FAQ).
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject on Football The article on Brøndby IF is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Selected content star Brøndby IF is part of the random selection of content on Portal:Association football. An excerpt from this article regularly appears on the Portal's main page.

Contents

[edit] Moved to Brøndby IF

I've moved the page as this better conforms to standards used both by the club and (it seems) by other Danish clubs. Please leave a message here if you intend to move it back. -- Elisson | Talk 00:00, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] GA

I have promoted this to good article status. It met most of the criteria, but failed on one which I have fixed myself - most of the images were appropriately tagged, but the logo was being used as fair use without a rationale. In fair use cases, it is not enough to include a blanket fair use tag to an image page, as each individual use needs to be justified. Since Image:Brøndby IF.png is being used here to illustrate the team it is the logo of, this should easily be sufficient rationale, so I added that to the image description page. (The bottom line is that although it is fair use here, it would not be fair use if used utterly gratuitously elsewhere - the context is important, which is why a note about the particular context needs to be appended to the image page). Well done to the editors on an excellent article; with a bit of work there is no reason for this not to become a featured article :-) TheGrappler 22:28, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

I think this is an excellent article that doesn't need all that much work to become a featured article. I've been looking at three other featured articles about football clubs (Arsenal F.C., IFK Göteborg and Manchester City F.C.) and compared to those it needs a section about the colours, crest and supporters. I don't know if this is a flaw in this article, but it seems strange that the section about Brøndby Stadium is larger than the main article about Brøndby Stadium. Anyway, with this done I think it should be submitted for a peer review, so it could become a featured article soon. --Maitch 22:01, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Danish 2nd Division E

Template:Danish 2nd Division E has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. kalaha 15:23, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wrong logo

The club logo is wrong. I mean the actual logo of Bröndby IF is this with the year on the bottom.--91.3.76.137 14:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)