User talk:Bowmister
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Speedy deletion of Bladder hammer
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Bladder hammer, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 21:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I would like proof the Bladder Hammer does NOT exist, for I own one and have described it perfectly. -Bowmister
- It's up to you to provide reliable references to show the Bladder Hammer exists. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 20:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Is a picture enough? I have one with me. -Bowmister
- No, please look at the link I provided. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 20:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, it says in bold that that page is a guideline for creating one. Show me the proof.
What if I INVENTED the bladderhammer. Would that be enough proff. HUH? -Bowmister
-
- If you persist in creating this article without providing any reliable source to show the object actually exists then the article will just get deleted again and you may get blocked from editing for disruption. Wikipedia:VERIFIABILITY is policy. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 20:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
If you keep spamming my talk page, I will report you for vandalism -Bowmister
- I'm answering your questions. How is that spamming? --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 20:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- All right, you asked for it, the obese amount of code that's INJECTED into my talk page with your custom color name is far too much, and you took 3 edits to say the exact same thing.
Anyone can use your talk page to communicate with you - they do not need your permission. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 20:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] March 2008
With regard to your comments on User talk:NeilN: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 20:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm going to eat your children one day. -Bowmister
Stay cool? Stay cool! What kind of crap is this.
[edit] Reward for the stupidist argument on wiki
Wiki would like you to accept the award for creating the Stupidist TALK PAGE OF THE YEAR! Please, I ask for a speedy reply to allow us to give you an online digital picture and will will even give you a free GOOD JOB! and a pat on the back. Congrats!Then probably kick you off the site
Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Bowmister, you will be blocked for vandalism. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 14:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- If you have a problem with my talk page, then don't go there, as you stated before, talk pages are not part of wiki, and permission is not needed to change it. Not to mention, you were quick to anger yourself when I posted on yours, yet I am not allowed to remove one that clamis several defematory remarks about me?
- You can certainly remove content from your talk page. What you cannot do is change the wording of my comments. --User:NeilN
- - I reserve the right to delete your colors on your name, mostly because It make it IMPOSSIBLE to edit my own talk page with all the clutter.
- You can certainly remove content from your talk page. What you cannot do is change the wording of my comments. --User:NeilN
[edit] Runescape Vandalism
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to RuneScape. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ۩ Dracion ۩ ✎ ✉ 20:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- I merely addressed what several quests involved, is this vandalism in any way?-Bowmister
Your edits were unconstructive. You might want to read WP:CTW before you do any more editing. Also, you can sign your edits using ~~~~. ۩ Dracion ۩ ✎ ✉ 06:20, 5 April 2008 (UTC)