User talk:Bowei Huang
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, and to this, your talk page!
You might want to read the pages Help:Contents/Getting started and Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia for some basic information about how the site works. (And there's a bunch more information linked to from the top-level Help:Contents. Enjoy! —Steve Summit (talk) 02:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Christian genre
You reverted my reversion faster than I could put the explanation on the talk page. Please read the talk page and reply to it before reverting the reversion again. This series is clearly not in the genre of Christian novels according to standard usage of the term, as I have documented.Sanddune777 (talk) 01:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 60.242.166.182 (talk) and Bowei Huang (talk)
In general, my experience says that it is a good idea to avoid subjects where the "questions" asked on the Ref Desk are transparent invitations to debate or challenge religious beliefs. It is also a good idea to log in and use your User Name at all times, as there is a tendency for others to assume that the use of an IP, expecially when you have a User name, is a way of avoiding accountability. Bielle (talk) 16:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, please avoid asking potentially inflammatory questions of opinion, as well as reposting very similar questions on multiple desks. There are, however, many web forums where the questions would probably be welcome. (I realize I'm mainly just repeating what was said above - the main point of this edit was to restore two comments to your talk page that had been deleted by a vandal earlier. :) ) -Elmer Clark (talk) 21:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Reference desk question
You have already been warned about reposting the same or similar questions on the reference desk. It is considered spamming. Your question has been removed again; future repostings shall be as well. If your intentions are actually to discuss this issue, not to spam links to a website, please find an online discussion forum - christianforums.com might be appropriate - to talk about it. The reference desk is not a discussion board; it is for questions of fact. -Elmer Clark (talk) 03:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of World Union of Deists
A tag has been placed on World Union of Deists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 03:57, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of World Union of Deists
A tag has been placed on World Union of Deists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mifter (talk) 01:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of World Union of Deists
A tag has been placed on World Union of Deists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Victao lopes (talk) 02:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, World Union of Deists, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Victao lopes (talk) 02:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 10:12, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of New Age apologetics
A tag has been placed on New Age apologetics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. PoinDexta1 07:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with New Age apologetics. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 04:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of Atheistic existentialism
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Atheistic existentialism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Collectonian (talk) 04:28, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Epistemological nihilism
A tag has been placed on Epistemological nihilism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Collectonian (talk) 04:28, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of Agnostic existentialism
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Agnostic existentialism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Collectonian (talk) 04:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of New Age apologetics
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article New Age apologetics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Collectonian (talk) 04:32, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of Epistemological nihilism
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Epistemological nihilism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Collectonian (talk) 14:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Epistemological nihilism
I have nominated Epistemological nihilism, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epistemological nihilism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Collectonian (talk) 07:19, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Zoroastrianism articles
Please do not copy and paste articles into other articles, like you did at Zoroastrian theology and Zoroastrian philosophy. Such copying of content violates the GFDL, which states that the original author of the text must be attributable to the content in question. Luckily, Wikipedia has a redirect feature that can be used to allow multiple titles to link to a single article, which I have utilized at the above titles. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. --Kinu t/c 07:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
