Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/YeltsinfanBot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Denied.

[edit] YeltsinfanBot

tasks • contribs • count • sul • logs • page moves • block user • block log • flag log • flag bot

Operator: Yeltsinfan (talk)

Automatic or Manually Assisted:

Programming Language(s):

Function Summary: To list status of users as Online of Offline. Please note that the code is from the bot of Chris G Bot 3(This code was published and offered to people).

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run):This bot will not run as of yet, but when it does, i would imagine 24/7 to log the status of users.

Edit rate requested:Just enough time or edits to maintain its task(See below) X edits per TIME

Already has a bot flag (Y/N):

Function Details:To log the status of users as Online/Offline

[edit] Discussion

Let us know when it's up and running, I'd be interested in seeing a trial. SQLQuery me! 11:28, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Whenever you are ready, Approved for trial (100 edits).. -- Cobi(t|c|b) 19:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm beginning to question the experience of the operator. He does have a few hundred edits, but mainly editing his userpage. I really think this user is too new to run a bot just yet, especially a bot that hundreds of people use constantly. He also has not listed the language, automatic/manual, and IMHO, does not show indication of having this bot working as of yet. I'm not trying to put Yeltsinfan down, I just believe that this user is too inexperienced to run a bot yet. Soxred93 | talk bot 13:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Oh, and by the way, User:EBot IV is now doing the task. Soxred93 | talk bot 14:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Template:Denied Ebot 4 is doing it now, no need for two of these bots. Soxred93 | talk bot 21:12, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.