Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/HermesBot 3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by operator.
[edit] HermesBot
tasks • contribs • count • sul • logs • page moves • block user • block log • flag log • flag bot
Operator: Wikihermit
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic - unsupervised
Programming Language(s): C#
Function Summary: WP:BOTREQ#Automatically_adding_protection_templates
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): one time runs (prompted)
Edit rate requested: 10 edits per minute
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y
Function Details: The bot will add {{pp-semi-protected}} to all pages in category:semi-protected that don't have a protection template on the page. If the page already has a tag the bot will skip the page.
[edit] Discussion
Yay! Approved for trial. --ST47Talk·Desk 22:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- May I request that the bot replaces the fully protected templates with semi protected, instead of ignoring? That would be incredibly useful, as the templates are misleading. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 05:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Like pages that aren't fully protected but are semi-protected, and have the fully protected tag? I'll give it a go. Also, the bot won't scan category:semi-protected as those are in that category because they have the templates on them already. Duh (My mistake). Instead it will check special:logs/protect to check for missed tags. ~ Wikihermit 06:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I meant ones that have the fully protected tag, and are semi protected, or vice versa, or have one but aren't protected (e.g. if they protection has expired). Apart from that, looks great. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 06:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- I can't do vice versa; the bot can't edit fully protected pages with semi-protected templates on it. :-( ~ Wikihermit 07:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmm, would it be possible to add the following to the talk page instead:
- I can't do vice versa; the bot can't edit fully protected pages with semi-protected templates on it. :-( ~ Wikihermit 07:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I meant ones that have the fully protected tag, and are semi protected, or vice versa, or have one but aren't protected (e.g. if they protection has expired). Apart from that, looks great. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 06:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Like pages that aren't fully protected but are semi-protected, and have the fully protected tag? I'll give it a go. Also, the bot won't scan category:semi-protected as those are in that category because they have the templates on them already. Duh (My mistake). Instead it will check special:logs/protect to check for missed tags. ~ Wikihermit 06:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
== Protected Template == {{editprotected}} The template on the page says the page is semi-protected, however it is full protected. Please change the templates over. <small>Note: This message was left by a bot. If it was in mistake, please remove this notice.</small> ~~~~
-
-
-
-
- That would request an admin to change it, and would probably work better. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 07:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
Withdrawn by operator. user:Madman bum and angel said he could add this to user:MadmanBot as another task, and this would be simpler for me. I plan on making another bot request doing a different task. I'm going to go ahead and withdraw this request. ~ Wikihermit 07:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.