Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Chris G Bot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was
Approved.
[edit] Chris G Bot
tasks • contribs • count • sul • logs • page moves • block user • block log • flag log • flag bot
Operator: Chris G
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic with Supervision
Programming Language(s): Perl using PerlWikipedia
Function Summary: The bot updates Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/AfD with the content in Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia.
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Daily
Edit rate requested: X edits per TIME 1-3 edits a day
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N
Function Details: See Here
[edit] Discussion
- Chris G, could you post to this page, please, to confirm that you are indeed this bot's operator? — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 02:36, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Cool; thanks. Otherwise, the routine looks good; I'd like to see the source code, but a trial will do. — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 03:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
{{BAGAssistanceNeeded}} Ok I've Completed the source code can I have a trial run? --Chris g 11:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Go ahead and trial for up to a week, let us know how it goes here. — xaosflux Talk 05:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- To use the proper template,
Approved for trial (7 days). Any news? Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 08:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC) - Nevermind, I misread the date. Any more bugs, or can I approve this? {{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 08:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- To use the proper template,
- I got all the bugs out so you can approve. --Chris g 10:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- Are you sure? You had to fix the last bot edit. ~ Wikihermit 17:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
The trial was for seven days, and I think you should continue it. It looks like you had a very rocky development process, and as you had to fix the bot's last edit, I don't know that the bugs are out. Approved for trial., for seven days more. The burden of proof is on you to prove that the bot is harmless and useful. — madman bum and angel 17:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- (Sorry if I'm not meant to post here) Would it be possible to include a wikilink in the bot's edit summary? I'd find that convenient. Thanks either way, Giggy Talk | Review 01:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. --Boricuaeddie 01:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- {{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} Do you have any more remaining bugs (that you know of), or is this ready to approve? Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 22:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. --Boricuaeddie 01:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- All done! You may now aprove -- Chris G talk 10:33, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- Approved. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 23:30, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
