Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BJBot 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< Wikipedia:Bots | Requests for approval

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

[edit] BJBot

tasks • contribs • count • sul • logs • page moves • block user • block log • flag log • flag bot

Operator: BJ^Talk

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): Python w/ pywikipedia

Function Summary: Remove the {{di-orphaned fair use}} from images that become used.

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Daily

Edit rate requested: maxlag=5

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: Remove the tag placed by BJBot task 1 if the image becomes used. I've seen this done by other users but I think it is my responsibility and should run at the same time as the tagging. This is purely a formality.

[edit] Discussion

No objections from me. — Werdna talk 06:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Does this bot only remove these templates from images it's tagged itself, or, all images? SQL ^{Query me!} 06:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I was planning on removing the template from any image that becomes unorhphaned (and if it becomes reorphaned BJBot will add the template back). BJ^Talk 06:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Seeing as I've done my fair share of detagging fixed images this is a good idea. A lot of newbies manage to fix their image, but don't know how to, that their supposed to, or that their even PERMITTED, to remove the warning tag. MBisanz ^talk 00:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

{{BotTrial}} SQL ^{Query me!} 12:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't see anywhere that it's obviously done this task... (and, it didn't edit from the 8th to the 17th...), How's this coming along? SQL ^{Query me!} 14:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

What's the status of this bot request? --uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹoɟ ʇs(st47) 16:02, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I've been busy. I just finished the code and added it the main process, it will run daily with the tagging operation. I just ran it and on the two image it detagged it worked flawlessly. [1] [2] BJ^Talk 07:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)