Talk:Boston RFC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Boston RFC has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
August 31, 2006 Good article nominee Listed

	Rugby union Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union. This project provides a central approach to rugby union-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing Boston RFC, and help us assess and improve articles to good and featured standards, or visit the project page, where you can join and view the list of open tasks.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Boston; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

[edit] Good Article discussion

Three thoughts, it looks quite good otherwise.

• Is there a reason the USA Eagles info is in its own section for once section, or would it be better incorporated into the paragraph above it?

• Super League invite? Obviously, they're there now, but is there any sort of source or anything mapping out the invite, perhaps a rugby history/Super League history citation? Not that I don't believe it, but I can imagine someone looking for more information on it.

• RFC honors. I was going to say "Hey, a lead-style para would be nice here," but then I noticed the relative size of the article. Expansion stuff, or could it be worked in here as prose, or perhaps both as a "For the full list, go [[here]]," then "Boston RFC has recieved many honors, including X, Y, and Z."

Otherwise, it's looking good. --badlydrawnjeff talk 19:53, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the great comments! I've just taken some time to attempt to implement your suggestions hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 20:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Excellent. The top part in particular seems to flow a lot easier for me. Pass! --badlydrawnjeff talk 20:12, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Good stuff! Thanks is due to Badlydrawnjeff for spending some of his valuable time to review the article! hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 20:15, 1 September 2006 (UTC)