User talk:Boromir Captain of Gondor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello. Please don't repost content deleted per policy. Thanks. :) - Lucky 6.9 23:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello, again. You're going to be in violation of the three revert rule if you keep on posting that article on the middle school debate team. Please don't do it again. Thanks much. - Lucky 6.9 23:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. I am trying to be nice, but you cannot post this article again. This is not the sort of thing that is notable enough for inclusion. If it reappears, I'll have no choice but to block you. - Lucky 6.9 23:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
I just told you. :) It is about a small school group. It isn't large enough to warrant inclusion here. Please don't repost it. - Lucky 6.9 23:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Negroponte doctrine
Dude, there is absolutely no reason in the world why an article page on an official U.S. government policy can't summarize the reasons which the U.S. governement has officially given as its motivations for adopting that policy. Furthermore, your statement about alleged "unfair bias against the United States" (in your somewhat incoherent edit summary) reveals a lack of detailed consideration of the article in question, since the Negroponte Doctrine has nothing to do with "unfair bias against the United States"[sic].
Why don't you actually READ all the external links in the article Negroponte doctrine -- and if you then are of the opinion that there's something in the article which doesn't come from the external links, then you can explain what it is and why, whereupon we can discuss it (because your current edits to the article are rather pointless from every point of view). AnonMoos 02:17, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Again
Dude, you've been whacking away at Negroponte doctrine for a month now, and I still don't really have the slightest idea what your alleged objections to the article are. It is not "weasel words" to give a statement of the U.S. government's motivations for adopting a U.S. government policy. If there's anything in my summary of the U.S. government's reasons for adopting a U.S. government policy which you feel does not fairly represent what is contained in the external links to the Negroponte doctrine article, then please state what you feel the SPECIFIC problems are in a comprehensible form. AnonMoos 07:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Age of Empires III military units
A tag has been placed on Age of Empires III military units, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted under Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. If you can indicate how Age of Empires III military units is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}}, and also put a note on Talk:Age of Empires III military units saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions.Diez2 23:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This is your last warning because you reposted an article that was already deleted with a consensus from the AfD discussions. This is a violation of Wikipedia guidelines. Also, this is not the first time that you have recreated articles that were deleted per AfD or CSD. Thus, this is your last and final warning. Diez2 21:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Battle of Thermopylae (1941)
A tag has been placed on Battle of Thermopylae (1941), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to provide more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately, and also put a note on Talk:Battle of Thermopylae (1941). An administrator should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 1 under Articles. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such material. Diez2 23:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Janet Napolitano
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Janet Napolitano, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Spike Wilbury 14:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] March 2008
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Janet Napolitano, you will be blocked from editing. MCB (talk) 18:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
