Talk:Borean languages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When there is no controversy, it doesn't make sense to say "highly controversial", and indeed the hypothesis is in such early stages that discussion, including rejection, doesn't make much sense. In the Starling database there are, for example, several proposed roots "*CVCV", where C is any affricate and V any vowel; this is not what a testable hypothesis looks like. So I changed the article. David Marjanović 21:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Help! The link [1] does not work. David Marjanović 21:27, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Turns out they added one character to the URL. I've fixed the link in the article. --JWB 01:33, 29 April 2007 (UTC)