User talk:Bongout

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You added the references tag to this article. I added a reference and removed the tag. You added the tag again. What's insufficient about my reference? It is from a scholarly, peer reviewed paper documenting this movement-in-the-making. I'm not sure I understand your objection.

Uh huh. And the added reference supports the existence of this neologism HOW, exactly? (This is, of course exactly the comment I left on my edit summary when I restored the tag.) --Calton | Talk 06:08, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you're being so antagonistic, but it's interfering with my ability to work with you. First, you started with the sarcasm, and now, instead of replying with something adding to your edit summary, you assumed I didn't read it and didn't address my question: why isn't the reference provided enough? It is a substantative paper describing a new social movement. It's not merely a neologism as you put it. Bongout 06:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you're being so antagonistic. I don't like it when someone dodges simple questions, I don't like it when someone displays obvious disingenuousness, I don't like it when someone claims to have done something they obviously haven't, and I don't like it when someone insults my intelligence. Other than that, not a thing about your response bothers me.
Third time -- and read carefully this time -- the added reference supports the existence of this neologism, the title of this article, the word you are using, HOW, exactly? You get one more shot, or it's straight off to AFD and you get to talk about it with a bunch more people. --Calton | Talk 07:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
I must first warn you that you're coming dangerously close to violating the Three Revert Rule, an official policy of Wikipedia. If you do that, you may be banned and you will be temporarily blocked from editing any pages on Wikipedia.
Now, I've already explained (in here and in other forums) how the paper I included as a reference includes information about this movement. However, I will repeat it for you since you seem not to have been following this discussion very closely. In the paper cited, the researcher, Prof. Hsiung, includes data she gathered as well as a sociological analysis of both that data and data already included in the Literature to document this movement in a scholarly fashion. Again, I'm not sure why such a source would be unsatisfactory. Bongout 08:02, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

I think the main problem that people are having with your reference is that they are not finding any evidence that the paper, the journal or the author even exist. If you could provide a link which would conclusively demonstrate that they do, this would help immensely. Please bear in mind that since you were the one who added this information, you have some responsibility to prove that it is not simply nonsense made up on the spot. This is not something aimed specially at you, this is standard policy. Try reading this, this and this. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 15:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Batman, Turkey. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please don't add Batman (the comic book) graphics to the article on the city of Batman, Turkey. Andareed (talk) 21:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Batsignal.jpg

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Image:Batsignal.jpg, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andareed (talk) 02:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Top secret.jpg

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Image:Top secret.jpg, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andareed (talk) 02:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Who are you?

You're obviously not new here and most likely a sock. Are simply using this account to avoid the gaze of Don Murphy? John Reaves 04:21, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] BADSITES

You might be interested in my essay on the subject. *Dan T.* (talk) 04:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IrishGuy talk 18:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Salvia

It was an independent convenience store in Barrie, Ontario. I found that it's available at another independent store just across the street from me as well. So someone's definitely working on distributing it. Lexicon (talk) 14:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)