User talk:Bongos
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] mask
why dont you take the mask off and front up to the reality here.. oh yeah, then you would be SEEN to be what you are... well its clear to me already, as i can SEE between the lines.... paul moss moza 10:24, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- hey P... [http:www.astronomy.geek.nz http:www.astronomy.geek.nz] is available for you to continue re-editing yourself endlessly to blindness.. there's another word for what you do. on the other hand, someone could buy it and publish the truth on it, now couldnt they...moza 22:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- It's a pity you took this all so personally. You failed to establish notability for the subject of your article - you - which is a criteria for inclusion in the Wikipedia. I VfDd the article and you've made a huge fool of yourself with the tantrums. How can you expect to be taken at all seriously as a professional?
- hey P... [http:www.astronomy.geek.nz http:www.astronomy.geek.nz] is available for you to continue re-editing yourself endlessly to blindness.. there's another word for what you do. on the other hand, someone could buy it and publish the truth on it, now couldnt they...moza 22:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] =new paragraph by moza
This isnt about establishing notability in this framework, with that article title, its never been used before so how could it be notable. I EXPECTED it to dissolve away ffs. notability does not = professional, and professional does not = what i admire, thats for people who believe in illusions. There are all kinds of professionals and all kinds of respect, a professional door man at a night club might have a degree in Martial arts, but the respect is purely physical. Establishing notability here simply means a count of votes, with the appropriate ratio, how easy is that? hardly any one cares right now, but how hard is it to muster an army of positive voters? and what does that really mean, consensus without proportional representation? what value is that? I believe in openess and honesty, and results. you just acted destructively for your own perverted pleasure, it makes no real difference to me in the end, I have all I need all ready, and I GIVE my results away CONSTRUCTIVELY... and its NOT huge, in fact no one is interested... and they are NOT tantrums, thats for reality and physical contact, otherwise the main guy himself was 'throwing tantrums' editing his site, not so. EVERYTHING here is more or less illusory, this isnt science, its a microcosm of the world, complete with a cr_p house, with an_l retentives trying to release their 'professional' stresses, and all the 'smoke and mirrors' to conceal whats really happening. If you think this is about me, then you have missed the point entirely, but i would expect that, and ironically there is an upside to you being distracted here to something that really is meaningless, in the scheme of things. The thing is, I have a life already, and I dont have to answer to anyone, but you are now under very close scrutiny, by professionals, notables, whatever, that can affect your life/career. I'm out the other end, so to speak, with nothing to lose, and no reason to hide. True Professionals are not going to take much notice of ANYTHING just because it is or not on wiki, its the inter-connectedness of the world that counts. Using the term 'YOU' refers to the wierdo with a disorder, it may be a sock puppet, an assumed name, ip, other persons even, whatever, and that may not be technically correct here on this page, but is effectively the same thing, it will do as a proxy for the purpose of discussion. Ive said elsewhere, I gota thank you for pushing this to the point where i neeeded to think it through, and research the policies and behaviours, it will come in handy, Oh, and its not over til the fat lady sings.... moza 13:43, 28 February 2006 (UTC)