User talk:BoLingua
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Hi BoLingua
As requested: User:BoLingua/Online alternate histories. Proto::type 14:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Foreigner universe = Alliance-Union universe?
Hi Bo-Lingua, I know you and Fairsing were engaged in this debate earlier this year. Well, if you haven't already seen it, it's resurfaced again here, along with a general discussion on the scope of the A-U. --Bruce1ee 05:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] To the president of the fanclub
My very own fanclub? Grrrr! We are pleased! [/me carefully avoids stepping on the little BoLingua on her way to destroy Tokyo with one stamp of her mighty feet]. Bishzilla 01:26, 22 November 2006 (UTC).
- *erects a cordon to protect sainted footsteps of the Great and Marvellous Bishzilla.*
- [/me sniffs cordon, tastes a piece of it, lapses into ancient mother tongue.] Hmpf? Staket runt fotspår? Inte så dumt! Smakar som spaghetti! [/me is lost in happy munching.] Bishzilla 16:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC).
- [/Caught up in the spirit of the moment, BoLingua responds, almost magically in the ancient mother tongue]..."Men de är bra spaghetti! Och din fotspår är helg, Störa Bishzilla!" Bo-Lingua 17:03, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- [/me sniffs cordon, tastes a piece of it, lapses into ancient mother tongue.] Hmpf? Staket runt fotspår? Inte så dumt! Smakar som spaghetti! [/me is lost in happy munching.] Bishzilla 16:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC).
[edit] Blaclisted site
Yeah, for the time being I've listed it on the WP:WHITELIST, it should be fine for now. There is discussion going on at WT:WPSPAM about this. Feel free to hop in. —— Eagle101 Need help? 00:51, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Zuiderzee Works
Yes... I saw your note on Bish's page, and anyway I was RC-patrolling tonight, so I'll watch. :) Antandrus (talk) 04:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Moho
I deleted the recent page on moho because it looked more like a justification of a neologism than an actual article, which made me suspect its veracity. If you can provide secondary sources for the term's usage outside of a circle of few friends, though, I won't protest the re-creation of a more encyclopaedic article for the term. Regards, --Fire Star 火星 14:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I see. The disambiguation page is good. If you can get us a citation to a book, television story, newspaper or magazine article that references the term, that would be great. Cheers. --Fire Star 火星 14:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- As far as I understand it from a cursory exploration it's in growing usage among those who identify both traits, but also, and maybe predominantly within a blog-circle. I googled the original contributor's name along with "moho" and found this article. I'm not sure how wide the circle is; it may be a small circle of friends. All the same, we can leave the disambig definition to at least prevent an edit war with Samanthastevens (I suspect this might be her only edit). Bo-Lingua 14:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- That article is a good start. I'll undelete the original article then, and add the citation. --Fire Star 火星 14:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- As far as I understand it from a cursory exploration it's in growing usage among those who identify both traits, but also, and maybe predominantly within a blog-circle. I googled the original contributor's name along with "moho" and found this article. I'm not sure how wide the circle is; it may be a small circle of friends. All the same, we can leave the disambig definition to at least prevent an edit war with Samanthastevens (I suspect this might be her only edit). Bo-Lingua 14:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] Category:Psuedoreligionist Wikipedians
As you may already be aware, Category:Psuedoreligionist Wikipedians and its subcategories, Category:Discordian Wikipedians, Category:Flying Spaghetti Monsterist Wikipedians, Category:SubGenius Wikipedians, and others, have been deleted. That deletion is now up for review. If you have anything you'd like to say on the subject, now is the time. If you know of any other editors who might have something to say on the subject, pass the word. If, on the other hand, you are not interested in the slightest, feel free to delete this. — Bigwyrm watch mewake me 11:03, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ill bethisad logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ill bethisad logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)