User talk:Boccobrock
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Your edit to racism
Technically reverted two serial vandalisms by the same twit, a few seconds apart, rather than one. --Orange Mike 18:24, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Aye, I did. Twinkle does that automatically, and both edits were vandalism. I'm not sure whats been done wrong, if you could elaborate. Boccobrock 18:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Now I see what you mean, that would be Twinkle's fault. Boccobrock 03:59, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Boccobrock! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. βcommand 17:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to Las Ramblas
FYI, Twinkle made a questionable deletion to the article on las ramblas 80.37.26.156 (talk) 12:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of "The Hack"
The Hack is a true, day to day event. There are many people involved in the sport, and there are even more who know what it is. Bobingson (talk) 06:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Suite Life of Zack & Cody has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Nn123645 (talk) 03:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- For future reference, the above edit was removing vandalism, some timing issue caused Nn123654 to issue me a warning. Boccobrock (talk) 03:26, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, disregard the above warn, got a bit too trigger happy with my huggle. -- Nn123645 (talk) 03:37, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] On Nazi Gold
Hey Boccobrock, Whilst I'm not constructive (I rarely am, I'm afraid), I would suggest you go back to the article and check the last sentence in the first paragraph. Perhaps then my 'vandal act' will be a bit more understandable.
Wonderful day, sir, have a wonderful day.
67.165.9.151 (talk) 03:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- While your edit ([1]) was in good faith, when someone adds something ridiculous or unverifiable, please undo their edit, instead of further vandalizing the page. Thanks, and best wishes! Boccobrock (talk) 03:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sketch (Word)
Is it easily possible to move this article, which I now see is just a definition, to wiktionary?--Rowandswim (talk) 00:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, saw the reply. Thanks!--Rowandswim (talk) 00:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] My recent edits
I'm not a propulsion engineer so I didn't know if it would work. --64.180.226.234 (talk) 23:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- You sure are fast, you must have no life. --64.180.226.234 (talk) 00:12, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
-
hi i got a message from username Exxolon... Im just still learning the site and have used the sandbox as well to help me. I don't think this individuals assumption of me was tactful. it was an indecorous reply to reference a career without having been a part of it. I undid the comment but was left with a sour taste to me. how do i completely delete my username or profile. can you help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jteddygarces (talk • contribs) 00:12, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] indecorous reply
hi i got a message from username Exxolon... Im just still learning the site and have used the sandbox as well to help me. I don't think this individuals assumption of me was tactful. it was an indecorous reply to reference a career without having been a part of it. I undid the comment but was left with a sour taste to me. how do i completely delete this username or profile from your site. can you help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jteddygarces (talk • contribs) 00:17, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your Edit of KP Singh
The facts that I wrote about KP Singh are correct and in line with Wikipedia policy. If you need proof you can send me your snail mail address and I would send you written proof of what I wrote.
I would request you to restore the content.
I am willing to send you all the facts by snail mail to back up the edit made by me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanishkasingh08 (talk • contribs) 04:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Kanishka Singh —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanishkasingh08 (talk • contribs) 04:16, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Helminthic Therapy
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Helminthic therapy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Boccobrock•T 00:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm curious - in what way is adding extra references for a subject unconstructive? --81.102.141.195 (talk) 22:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- It does look like the link you posted is pretty relevant, but since you added on "Don't read this while eating supper" it sends a bit of a red flag to us vandalism fighters. We don't have time to go through every link people add to articles. I've gone ahead and re-added the link. Boccobrock•T 23:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)