Talk:Bobby Lashley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bobby Lashley article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability
Archives: 1

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

	Professional wrestling Portal Bobby Lashley is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Dominator

Last time I checked, the dominator and the running powerslam were two entirely different things (but yes, both used as his finisher). They called the inverted powerslam the dominator, but they always called the running powerslam the running powerslam, never the dominator. They should be separated. 3pointswish (talk) 01:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] TNA

Not sure if that's worth putting in. If not, just remove it. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.235.160.40 (talk) 17:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Remove it, its pure IWC rumour bs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.194.157 (talk) 07:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC)