User talk:Bože pravde
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] For no particular reason
Hope you have a good day! Nengscoz416 (talk) 01:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Portal:Serbia
Hey, I was wondering if you would be interested in adding a few entries to keep this portal updated... (It will automatically change articles every month.) Thanks, --Bolonium (talk) 01:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Albanians in Serbia
Hi, I noticed your edits to this and its related articles. I certainly understand the reasoning for combining them into the one article. But this article was created by copy and pasting, and was done without seeking consensus. I also understand that we can't keep all three of the articles - we need either the two seperate ones or the combined article. But if we're going to put them together, we at least need to do a proper merger, and not simply a blank-and-redirect. I don't want to turn this into an edit war so I'm not going to undo your edits, but I'd appreciate it if you would. Thanks! Dchall1 (talk) 04:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] February 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Kosovo. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. <3 bunny 19:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, but I think you just violated 3RR with respect to Kosovo. What are you trying to do, get blocked? — Rickyrab | Talk 19:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kosovo
Per this arbitration case you are hereby banned from Kosovo and all closely related pages for one week. This ban will be enforced by rollbacks and blocks if necessary. No point letting you game the system and continue with disruptive editing, is there? Moreschi If you've written a quality article... 19:19, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, I see you didn't quite understand this. Please read this and this for explanation. Moreschi If you've written a quality article... 14:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
The current version of Kosovo article is saying it is a region in the Balkans. Huge efforts were put in making this article as neutral as possible, please, discuss changes on the talkpage and do not revert again without discussion. --Tone 23:29, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Admin coaching request update
 |
You have previously expressed an interest in undergoing the Admin coaching program. We're currently engaged in a program reset to help things move more smoothly in the future. If you are still interested in the program, please go to Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching and re-list yourself under Current requests, deleting your entry from Older requests. Also, double-check to make sure coaching is right for you at the Coachee checklist; WP:Adoption or WP:Editor review may be more appropriate depending on your situation and aspirations. We should get back to you within a day or so, once a coaching relationship has been identified. Thank you. MBisanz talk 07:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC) |
[edit] Wrong Inner German border
The border between East and West Germany in this image is not where it should be, see Inner German border. West Berlin ist also misssing (i.e. a part of East Germany). There went something completely wrong, it seems to me. Could you correct it please? --Abe Lincoln (talk) 15:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- User:Kmusser fixed it... --Abe Lincoln 13:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Cut-and-paste moves
Hi. I noticed that you redirected Novak Djokovic to the title with the non-English spelling. I have reverted you, because we can't do "cut-and-paste" page moves. They separate the history from the article, and that's not ok for legal reasons relating to our GFDL license. I have posted at WP:AN requesting review of my closing; please allow the process to run. If you disagree with the broad consensus that we follow sources in determining article names, please raise that issue in the appropriate venue; I'll be happy to help you do that. Cut-and-paste moves aren't going to fly, though. -GTBacchus(talk) 20:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] transliteration?
Hi
I don't know whether you have seen but there is a similar discussion on the article about Franjo Tuđman.
Similar discussion as with Novak Đoković: some guys want to change đ into dj at the name of the article.
Could you help me with that ? --Anto (talk) 11:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] transliteration?
Hi
I don't know whether you have seen but there is a similar discussion on the article about Franjo Tuđman.
Similar discussion as with Novak Đoković: some guys want to change đ into dj at the name of the article.
Could you help me with that ? --Anto (talk) 11:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
You have to consider that the article is on probation and all significant changes have to be discussed on the talkpage first. Thank you for your understanding!--Getoar (talk) 05:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Serb Province Infobox
What up? I agree with you, and I really like the info box you made.
However, we must first discuss it. Post it in the talk page, thanks. Beam 00:41, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] I believe consensus has been reached on your proposal
As far as I'm concerned you may replace the UNMIK box with the Serb Auto Province box.
Be sure to re-read the last few comments atTalk:Kosovo#Template_of_how_over_150_countries_see_Kosovo to make sure you understand exactly what you're enacting.Let me know if you have any questions.
As an aside, I hope you understand my position when I revert edits you've made. I'm not necessarily commenting on the quality of the edits, but on the fact that this article is such a contentious fire pit that edits of that type can not be made without discussion FIRST. Again, I'm just trying to keep this article from being relegated to an edit war or worse to be completely protected and locked. :) Beam 23:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Admin coaching request status
 |
You have expressed interest in undergoing the Admin coaching program. However, after reviewing your edit history, I feel you may need more experience editing (i.e., >1,750 edits & 4 months of activity) on Wikipedia before you can know for certain your ready to begin the process of becoming an administrator. Therefore, at this time, your application for Admin Coaching has been declined.
My suggestion would be to seek adoption from a more experienced user who can help you experience all of the various components of editing an encyclopedia. If you decide adoption is not for you, there is also the editor review process that may help you find areas to improve upon in our editing. If you would like to talk more about this, please feel free to leave me a note at my talk page. Malinaccier (talk) 22:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC) |
On a more personalized note, I would suggest getting involved in areas such as WP:XFD, and WP:NPP. Happy editing, Malinaccier (talk) 22:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
