User talk:Bmrbarre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Churchill County High School

Hi, you may like to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Churchill County High School TerriersFan 21:18, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks...very interesting debate. It goes far beyond the actual article, and questions what notability is, and how to define that. Therefore, it questions a part of the foundation of Wikiepdia. Bmrbarre 21:49, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Arthur Bruno Zorn

It was moved because of a discussion on this page. An AFD process happens when another editor feels the page you submitted is not suitable for Wikipedia as it was written. You are free to work on it in your user subspace: User:Bmrbarre/Arthur Bruno Zorn. --BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, odometer) 22:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. Your explanation was very helpful, as was your userfication (is that a word?) Bmrbarre 22:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

== Image:Suppertime(1).jpg listed for deletion ==

[edit] Recommendation

Just a recommendation, you may want to consider putting yourself up for "adoption." You seem to have a lot to contribute and, with a mentor over you shoulder, you'll definitely increase your productivity with such help. See Adopt-a-User for more details.

All the Best --> SERSeanCrane 19:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Fred Swan

An editor has nominated Fred Swan, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Swan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 22:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Help

You seem to know a lot about the notability policy and just Wikipedia in general, so could you please help me this one time, or at least give me some advice on how to stick up for my articles. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred_Swan please. Thanks, Bmrbarre 23:39, 25 February 2007 (UTC) ^{Drop me a note}

I have cleaned the article up a bit. Two avenues are needed to ensure that an article is kept:

• Links from other articles - I have added links from Spaulding High School and Barre (city), Vermont.
• Independent sources - you need to find reviews of his work in significant publications.

I have supported the retention of the article since the AfD is premature but long term independent references are the key to an article being kept. Please get back to me if I can help further. TerriersFan 00:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. TerriersFan 17:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD

Thought I'd let you know that someone has nominated St. Monica's for deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Saint_Monica's_Church. SERSeanCrane 04:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Book

You can add a Book as a source just use "<ref>Author, Title, place and date of publication, page numbers</ref>" after the material you are sourcing from it. Written sources (as many as possible) are likely to support its retention. --Doc^g 14:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lakelands Park Middle School

You may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakelands Park Middle School. TerriersFan 18:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stowe Recreation Path

This is looking a very good article - well done. You might like to look at some of the edits that I have made to Stowe Recreation Path. The key points that might be of help to you are:

• The title of the article should be repeated in the first sentence and bolded - see WP:MOS.
• Please note how I have named references to eliminate the need to duplicate identical references.
• A description of the reference should be included in the reference. This is much more important than the access date since it enables the reader to determine whether they are interested in the reference without having to click on it.
• Please see how I have linked the article from Stowe, Vermont - linking is important because it facilitates people finding, and reading, your article. HTH. TerriersFan 18:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Spaulding

No problem. Good to see you got adopted by Terrier. He does good work. SERSeanCrane 20:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 3 March 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stowe Recreation Path, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--BigHaz - Schreit mich an 04:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations! TerriersFan 02:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Bmrbarre 15:17, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Fred Swan Blue Moon.jpg

I think that we could have a problem with the licensing of this image. On reflection this looks as if it was lifted from the specified website which is a definite 'no, no'. I think more information about its providence is needed :-( TerriersFan 02:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

I know. And I have no clue how to get an image onto the page. I can't find any pictures of him, and his artwork is clearly commercial, so I can't use that. Can I take a picture of one of his prints that hangs on my wall and then se that? Would it be considered my own work?

And I need some help on redirecting. I created a page entitled Mining in Roman Britain, and I linked a few pages to it, but no one is going to type in Mining in Roman Britain. I mean, come on. So, how can I get people to the article if they type in a different title? Bmrbarre 15:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mendip Hills FAC

Thanks for your edits of Mendip Hills. I have now put it up as a Featured Article Candidate & comments, support or opposition is being recorded at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mendip Hills.— Rod ^talk 10:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reversion

It's good. I noticed the link Link title within the text and removed it as soon as I was aware. That's the beauty of having swift reversion tools and a keen eye for this kind of things. Regards. Bobo. 20:42, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Edge of Night (song)

Hi, your references 1, 4, 5 and 6 are broken and need fixing. I have reformatted your AfD comment in a form that is likely to get a better reaction; calling for the AfD to end is a bad idea - it will only put backs up - let the arguments speak for themselves. TerriersFan 23:07, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Edge of Night (song)

No, I will most certainly not forgive your rudeness. Please see WP:CIVIL. Your childishness aside, however, please understand that although you may be new to Wikipedia, that gives you no reason to accuse another editor of "destroy"ing "your" article -- please see WP:OWN. No article is truly yours, though you may have (haphazardly) created it. Furthermore, the "guidelines" you cited on my talk page are only proposed ones and are therefore not yet accepted by the Wikipedia community. Notability of song articles should be thought of in terms of WP:MUSIC, of which an article devoted to a forty-five second song and is sourced by fansites on Geocities and Tripod, I'm relieved to say, do not meet. As for reliable, relevant sources, please see WP:ATT. "A wonderful frame-by-frame storyline of the Return of the King" is not reliable nor is it relevant. As for "wonderful" and other shoddy modifiers, see WP:WEASEL. Because I am not an admin, I cannot close the AFD debate. You are welcome to voice your opinion on the discussion page, but I still think the article is not reliably sourced and only fits biased, fangirl notions of notability. Lastly, and this is important, don't take these things personally, as they happen quite frequently on Wiki (meaning the nominating and the discussion and the deletion). If you can't handle someone messing with your edits, then don't make them in the first place. I suggest you do some heavy-handed research on the above policies and others before again delving deeply into matters on Wikipedia. Good luck. María (habla conmigo) 23:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

The "I know you are, but what am I?" tactic is also covered under WP:CIVIL. Your arguments are weak, but I do acknowledge the fact that your edits are not malicious and that you are genuinely making an effort to improve Wikipedia. However, for the second time, Geocities and Tripod pages do not constitute "research," no matter how you refer to them -- don't put lipstick on a pig. Again, this is not personal. I do not believe your age or status have anything to do with the article's notability issues, so there is no need to explain yourself or your editing habits to me. If you feel the need to explain your reasons for creating the article, by all means add it to the AFD discussion page; my opinion has already been voiced. If WP:MUSIC does not answer your need for more suitable guideline and policy, perhaps these will:

• Notability is not popularity: "...many people are interested in this song, as shown by the number of people who have viewed the video on YouTube..."
• Plot summaries: "Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance, not solely a summary of that work's plot."
• What is a reliable source?: "Reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy, or are authoritative in relation to the subject at hand."
• Self-published sources: "Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published books, personal websites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources."

Failing that, look at Featured Articles on songs and see how The Edge of Night compares. On a side note, if individuals are listing articles you've created for deletion, perhaps you should consider your future contributions more carefully. If you have any further questions, perhaps you should direct them at your adopter. María (habla conmigo) 00:39, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

The Steward of Gondor is not notable in a similar way that eighteen of the nineteen tracks from the RotK soundtrack are also not notable. Therefore, no, I don't believe it has much merit. We're talking less than a minute of a vocal that is neither critically acclaimed nor is it attributable to many reliable sources. I could see adding interviews with Boyd and/or Shore that would attest to its creation (which is unusual; an actor writing his own music and such), but other than that, what is there? Look at this objectively and you have very little to work with, material-wise. There is a plot explanation, which can be removed completely because of it's merely filler, a trivia section, which never has a place in an article and should be integrated elsewhere, and an awards section that is concerned with the award winning soundtrack, which is already mentioned on the RotK article. I believe what little material remains should be merged into the Music of LotR article or RotK, but what is there has been stated elsewhere. In short, nothing is new information and I still endorse deletion. Thank you for being a little more Civil, though. María (habla conmigo) 02:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Again, if you have questions and/or concerns, it would be better if you directed them elsewhere. I'm not interested in collaborating on this subject and I've already given you advice to the best of my ability. Again, this AFD is not in my hands; I merely nominated the article based on what it lacks, and so far there has been very little improvement. María (habla conmigo) 14:45, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure how to state this in a way you will understand, since I already attempted (see above), so this time I'll be blunt: I'm not interested. Post your ideas/comments/etc on the article's talk page, where they belong and where people who are interested will see them and respond. María (habla conmigo) 01:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Pippincryingthedgeofnight.jpg

Hello Bmrbarre, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Pippincryingthedgeofnight.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Bmrbarre/The Edge of Night (song). This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Pippinprintscreen.jpg

Hello Bmrbarre, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Pippinprintscreen.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Bmrbarre/The Edge of Night (song). This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gaius Pontius

The first thing to do with internet sources is write them so the reader can read it instead of just a number. This is done by adding text after a space after the URL: [http://www.something.com Analysis at something.com], which will show up as Analysis at something.com instead of [1]. Also, if you list them as a bulleted list (with each line starting with *) they are listed in less space.

As far as the sources, I deleted the one that was a monologue about the event, since it (being fictional, though based on an event) does not claim to make a clear distinction between what is fact and what is the author's additions. That may be suitable for an external link, but it does not have the reliability needed for a source. Further, wikipedia, answers.com (which largely copies material from wikipedia) and forum entries are generally not considered reliable sources. Anyone can contribute to them, whether they know anything about the subject or not, and they therefore cannot claim the accuracy required. Forums and blogs are generally discouraged, unless they are connected with a well-known journalist or something (and they still are not considered to have the reliability of articles by that journalist). I deleted the ancientworlds.net and romansonline sites because (when I looked at them quickly) they only had pretty basic information that seemed to be repeated elsewhere, so I didn't think they were necessary.

A cleaner way to reference is to use <ref> tags. This is explained at Wikipedia:Footnotes. It's usually a good idea, especially when you have cited information from various sources, to put this after each piece of information, so people checking the veracity of the article can find each fact. It's especially recommended on any controversial or unlikely claims, often including those that go into DYK hooks--it wouldn't hurt for yours. The other statements in the legacy part seems like it could use citations as well. If I was wrong about what I thought were unnecessary sources, you could add them in ref tags, thus making it clear where their information was cited.

Other things that would be great to add to the article if you can find them (they may not be known): birth and death dates (approximate is better than none), anything about his life or background, and if he had children and how many (if Pontius Pilate is really a descendent then that implies it, but that could easily be a folk legend). But the article seems strong enough and the hook interesting enough that I think it would get chosen. Rigadoun (talk) 15:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 25 May 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gaius Pontius, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Foedus Cassianum

You're welcome. It's a great topic, you gave a great base, it was very fun to work on it--Work permit 03:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Congrads. I appreciate your kind comments on my talk page, that and seeing a great article on DYK is credit enough --Work permit 21:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 7 June 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Foedus Cassianum, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Royalbroil 19:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sicilian revolt

On 9 June 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sicilian revolt, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 17:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Llama

Hi there. Just thought I'd let you know I reverted your edits to the Llama article. I don't think this was malicious and so I did not mark it as vandalism. However, I do think you should practice editing in the Sandbox as you can do all kinds of things there without impacting articles. --BlindEagle^{talk~contribs} 12:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 25 June 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cherry Pie (Warrant song), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 15:03, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Poposed WikiProject

Your proposed project is brilliant! Look forward to participating. Answered you by email earlier.Student7 12:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thunder Road International Speed Bowl

I noticed your addition of the track to Ken Squier's article. If you're looking for something to do (ha ha!), the article could use expansion with the history of the track including start year, list of divisions (with pictures is better), and a list of track champions. I added that it is paved, which is obvious from the picture in the Kenny Wallace article. Is it asphalt or concrete? Royalbroil 15:11, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Caledonian-Record

With your new changes, this article may be the first in Wikipedia to be catapulted from Afd to GA! :) Thanks for those valuable additions! Student7 00:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't think it's quite that good, but it shouldn't have a problem passing this little test with flying colors, and come out all the stronger. Thanks for the compliments, by the way. Ben 01:08, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Your research and edit on the Supreme Court resulted in the announced withdrawal of the Afd! Congratulations! And thanks again for your support! Student7 02:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Race Car Memorial.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Race Car Memorial.jpg, by IvoShandor (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Race Car Memorial.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Race Car Memorial.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 10:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 18 July 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hope Cemetery, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 15:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] images?

The images at Hope Cemetery; did you take them and release them under {{GFDL}}? — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 16:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

No, I didn't take them, so I can't release them. I got them from Flickr, and they all said public, so I'm putting them to use. I hope I used the right tag. If not, could you please advise me as to which one I should use? Thanks, Ben 00:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Wel, none of them seem to have a source, so the license can't be checked on them. If you can provide the source (just the url to the picture would be fine) that would make the pictures great -- even accessable to other wikiprojects because that would make them eligible to move to Wikimedia Commons. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 04:45, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

I didn't think it was because the article was well done otherwise. That place looks very very cool. Thanks for your work and if I come across any photos I will add them as well. : ) Thanks for understanding. IvoShandor 05:35, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 21 August 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Maine Diner, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Wizardman 23:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Maine Diner

Hey, it's no problem! The person who tagged it was an IP that made only 2 edits, and it was tagging that article and then saying something on the talk page. I don't believe that the tagging was made in good faith, I think it was vandalism (also, being noticed on the Main Page). --Son 01:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Maine diner sign.jpg

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Maine diner front 2.jpg

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Bikepath map.gif

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Race Car Memorial.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Race Car Memorial.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peta 04:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyrights

Ben, images may be public on Flickr, that doesn't mean they are in the "public domain", it means that the owner has no restrictions on who can view them. If you want to find images on flickr that can be used on wikipedia you need to do an advanced search for images that are creative commons licensed that can be used both commercially and modified; if you can find images that meet these by all means upload them to the commons, there is a special tool there to help people corretly attribute images from flickr. --Peta 00:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Governor's_White.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Governor's_White.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Stowe_bike_path.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stowe_bike_path.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:47, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 31 August 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Palazzo Malta, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks! Daniel 06:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:Pippincryingthedgeofnight.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pippincryingthedgeofnight.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tunka Manin

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [2] --Ronz 16:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fred Swan Blue Moon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fred Swan Blue Moon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:25, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 11 November 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aimar V of Limoges, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 23:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandal

No problem. I am against vandalism. Question, what is your view on bigotry? I personally have 0 Tolerance what about you? Or is there any official wiki policy on that?--Jab843 (talk) 03:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm very much against bigotry. I don't think that there is any specific policy against it, but WP:NPA, Wikipedia:Don't be a dick, and this all tend to say that being nice and non-biggoted is certainly preferred. Thanks again, Benjamin 14:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for experimenting with the page User:SchuminWeb, and for reverting your edits. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In the future, please do not experiment on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. Thank you. -Goodshoped 03:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Not my contributions, actually: You can thank my darling little brother for that. My password has been changed...Benjamin 03:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

By the way, I left a response to your message on my own talk page. In short: No problem. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My Bands

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For an absolutely cracking idea on how to improve my user pages look and feel, and for making such a suggestion in a refreshingly humorous way, I'd like to award you, Benjamin, with The Random Acts Of Kindness Barnstar. Ferdia O'Brien (Talk) 16:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] All Saint's Church of Wittenberg (Translation)

Hi. The German article itself isn't very long, so tomorrow I'm going to try to translate it. --escondites 19:09, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Look at my attempt for translation. What do you think? --escondites 16:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

No, I haven't saved it in an infobox, but there's no need to! The revision's saved here. --escondites 13:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image moving

Try: User talk: TerriersFan#Image moving. TerriersFan (talk) 21:47, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Schloss Wittenberg translation

I’d be happy to translate. Do you want me to “carve up” the information and distribute into the English version’s sections, or would you rather I translate the whole thing as a “chunk” and put it, say, in your sandbox for you to divvy up? Note that a point of concern, however, is that the German version doesn’t cite sources, which is something the GA review would look for. Ɛƚƈơƅƅơƚɑ _talk 01:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] All Saints' Church, Wittenberg

Please see User talk:Escondites#All Saints' Church, Wittenberg. TerriersFan (talk) 16:45, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 9 January 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article All Saints' Church, Wittenberg, Germany, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--The Placebo Effect (talk) 22:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] All Saint's Church

I've left a message at WikiProject Architecture to review the article. My guess, uneducated as it is, is that it could stand a lot more details regarding the construction. Hopefully, someone will respond soon. John Carter (talk) 20:52, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

You're right. I'll have to get working on that. Benjamin ^{Scrīptum est - Fecī} 21:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sig

Your signature contains a link to your contributions, but the link doesn't work. Replace Special:Contributions/User:Bmrbarre with Special:Contributions/Bmrbarre and it will work. 65.4.50.162 (talk) 20:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! Wow...that's a costly mistake. Benjamin ^{Scrīptum est - Fecī} 21:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rock of Ages Corporation

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Rock of Ages Corporation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:31, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Palazzo Malta

Thank you :-D I don't have photographs of Villa Malta, just Palazzo Malta :-) I've been this last week in Rome and I saw the palace when I was going for a walk, so I thought that could be a good idea to take a photo for wikipedia :-)...It's an interesting place, ...the entrance is forbidden for tourists, but I come in when the guard was absent :-D Regards --Willtron (?) 22:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes I have a lot of pictures of Rome, but mainly the typical places, so I thing that almost every article exists in English Wikipedia... Photos without article...maibe the "Vatican Carriage Museum" (part of the Vatican Museums)...I have some photos inside and outside the museum. I have a phtograph of a flag of the Order of the Holy Sepulchre in a palace in Via della Conziliazione... I don't know if this is the Headquarters of the order in Rome, but there is nothing about this palace in Wikipedia. I have photos of the "Domus augustana" in the Palatine Hill. And I also have a bit blurry photograph of a Ferrari in "Via Vittorio Veneto", that's the most luxurious street in Rome. Just tell me what photos you are interested in and I'll upload them :-) --Willtron (?) 12:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of category from your userpage

Hi. In enacting consensus from User categories for discussion, I have removed the category Category:Wikipedians interested in books from your userpage. It was determined in that deletion debate that this category should be depopulated of individuals, but kept as a parent category. If you wish to display a category reflecting your interest in books, please consider one of the specific sub-categories under its umbrella. Thanks, and please excuse the necessary editing of your user page! ----Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Roman Catholic Church

Thanks for your support vote and vigorous defense of the article and my sweet daughter's two cents on the matter. NancyHeise (talk) 01:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] FAC commentary

Please remember that the purpose of WP:FAC is to determine if an article meets WP:WIAFA and avoid off-topic commentary in the interest of keeping focus on the task at hand.[3] I've removed several of your comments to the talk page now. Thank you, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Commentary

You general should take comments at face value, in particular, I'm not sure why you assumed sarcasm was intended here Talk:Main Page#Abraham Lincoln shot since none was, nor did I (from what I can tell) give any indication it was... Nil Einne (talk) 15:57, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RCC

I was just reading through the FAC comments and saw where you wrote :"That is the one thing that is currently holding me back from giving a support as I previously have. I detest plagiarism with a passion, and any article with it should not be allowed to exist, let alone be featured. The only thing I could really do, without having any good books on this subject, is to reword the phrases in question to make it sound less lifted, but that wouldn't accomplish all that much. Anyone have any better ideas? Benjamin Scrīptum est - Fecī 02:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)"

I wanted you to know that I did a thorough check of sources and the changes that it resulted in are documented on the discussion page of the FAC (not the project page, the project page discussion page). Karanacs has struck her plagiarism comment as a result of this thorough check. NancyHeise (talk) 20:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Roman Catholic Church

FAC has restarted, if you would like to vote, please go here [4] Thanks. NancyHeise (talk) 19:54, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your support vote at Roman Catholic Church NancyHeise (talk) 04:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)