User talk:Bmg916/Archive6
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
wwefan980talk
Do you know who deleted my article of phonetrace.org? Wwefan980 11:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
I understand the Civil manner thing you mentioned, I'll try my best. As far as the article that was deleted, I'll contact that person who did it and ask why. Thanks. Wwefan980 15:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Why are you deleting my requests to Longhair to know why my article was deleted? Wwefan980 16:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Ok thank you. I didn't know about talk page archives and stuff. Wwefan980 18:58, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Guess what, stubborness of edits isn't vandalism. Go ahead, report me. You think you are always right, guess what you are not. And you are a stalker, you can't leave me alone. So do me a favor and stop worrying about me. Everyone doesn't agree with that warning either. I try to be civilized, but you make threats. Go ahead and do whatever, if you really think I am hurting an article. Telling other users what the overall rules are rather then thought out rules which can't officialy be enforced isn't doing anything and is civilized. If I cussed, made an incorrect change, or a joke change that would maybe be vandalism. I know if you do report me to an administrator I might get blocked, but I have looked and I see administrators abusing their power all the time, not abiding by the rules but rather abiding by their own beliefs. I thought we would eventually get along, but you think you're such a smart superior being towards me and it's not going down like that. I want a fair warning, not nothing so strict as to making edits once a pay per view(sometimes there are exceptions but only when users like you make the edit). But since there can't be one, I don't know what will happen. I may as well give up, it's obvious the users here feel they are dominant and if their edits are changed they need to report someone. Boo hoo, you don't see me doing that. Why do you have to be like this? I see you all over every single wrestling article, always pressing your edits until they are final. As if you can't be correct. Wwefan980 23:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
At first, you just can't leave me alone. Now I've noticed you are going to all of my edits on wrestling articles and re-wording them. Which doesn't even make sense because you always spell the word: "grammar" like this: "grammer" and your wording makes little since in comparison. If you want to go even this far in your obsession with my edits, feel free it's pretty clear I make more sense but I know how you can't get enough of trying to feel suprerior to me even though you are clearly not. Wwefan980 14:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Well it doesn't seem like that and all of those edits were direct counters of mine. But you know, I can't tell you not to. So just do your thing and I'll do mine. It does seem like you think you are better, but I don't really think that you think that because you seem very humble. Sorry for getting offended I suppose. Wwefan980 16:06, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I've noticed an edit that talked about Jerry Lawler's career was simply deleted and identified as vandalism. This vandalism was just someone else's opinion, and in fact the person blanking so much information is vandalism. It just needs to be tagged as needing to be verified. If anything that is unsourced is allowed to be blanked, then I am going to go and blank alot of articles. I'm not the one editing, but since you edit alot I figured I would tell you and here what you have to say. People on here seem like jerks and call anything they don't agree with vandalism, and it's making me mad. And it's weird because I am not the one getting edits reverted, but others are and it's not right. Jerry Lawler's article has a bunch of information that people are refusing to allow on there, when it's not their place. Wwefan980 15:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Wow that was a very neutral answer(I like that), thanks. Wwefan980 00:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Mike Mizanin move
A user named Socks 01 moved Mike Mizanin to Mike 'The Miz' Mizanin without consensus. I strongly oppose to the move as nicknames should not be included in article names. They should either be the person's real name or their in-ring name. I tried to move it back but was unable to do so. I am not sure about what actions to take next. - Deep Shadow 13:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for doing that. And just for future reference, are there any administrators that are part of WikiProject Professional wrestling? - Deep Shadow 15:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sigh, the user moved it TWICE again. Now it can't be moved back to Mike Mizanin. I have requested Mike Mizanin be speedy deleted (since the edit history now just consists of the two moves) so that the article can be moved back. TJ Spyke 03:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Yo it's RealTNAFan
Hey dude do you think that RVD's concussion is real or is it his contract expiring and what's with all the injuries. if you get this message holla back man. Thanks. Peace. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RealTNAFan (talk • contribs)
- oh that sucks we have reasonable source but i guess we'll find that out sooner or later. peace out —Preceding unsigned comment added by RealTNAFan (talk • contribs)
A Notice
I sign your lil book go see what it saids :DArnon Chaffin (Talk) 23:18, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- No problem only if..I could reach for it.Nooo!:-)Arnon Chaffin (Talk) 23:21, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Sock puppets
Highly likely sock puppet activity happening in the Tommy Dreamer article. Wasn't sure who to inform. - Deep Shadow 23:24, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Nevermind. Most of them have been taken care of. You may delete this section if you wish. - Deep Shadow 23:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
sig
I liked the idea of giving people what they want (another sig) while doing what I want (pointing to the sig guideline). Thank you for proving my attempt right, as I wasn't sure people would respond very well. —AldeBaer 00:00, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Worth it already, seeing your shiny new sig. Now people can come throw dirt at me, I don't mind. :D —AldeBaer 00:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, and ditto! —AldeBaer 00:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Autograph
Yor welcome for signing your autograph book. May I just ask through, what is the book for?
Cheers,
Politics rule 11:22, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thanks
Thanks so much! Corrected that issue on WP:RFPP —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rackabello (talk • contribs)
Vent
Sorry for this post but I just have to vent some frustration. There is one user in particular that annoys me with the rude way they delete content from articles. I don't really care that they delete it, but they are rude by how they say it. Also the way they add "references" in the external links section. They are usually stupid "sources" to findarticles.com, most of which require registration which is against WP:EL. And now we have to cite moves lists because they say so? Annoying!
Sorry again for the rant. It just had to come out. - Deep Shadow 19:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
WWE Raw
Do you mind watching this too? User:JakeDHS07 keeps adding a logo that he claims is free. -- bulletproof 3:16 17:27, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
User talk:JKrantoski
I blocked him indefinitely. Thanks for the heads up. There is nothing more disruptive than a page move vandal. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 16:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yep. Well. At least this isn't the old days. :) I'm an old hat. Been here since December 2004. It used to be that when you moved a page to where it started, it created a double redirect. Thank goodness they fixed that bug. So if you moved page A to page B and then back to A, you would end up with a redirect from A to B to A. lol But still. It's a pain. If you see any sockpuppets of his, let me know. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 16:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Undisputed title
Could you also add WrestleMania X8, Royal Rumble (2002), WWE Backlash, and WWE No Way Out to your watchlist? Mshake3 keeps changing the name of the Undisputed title when these events clearly used another name. Check out these screen caps from Vengeance 2001 No Way Out 2002 WrestleMania X8 and Backlash 2002. -- bulletproof 3:16 16:18, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Professional Championship Wrestling
The PROD has been removed three times by the page creator so I have nominated it for AfD, it can be found here [1]. Darrenhusted 01:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Changed it to say without. Darrenhusted 01:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
I have grouped the articles relating to the main one, if you want to change your Delete to Delete All. Darrenhusted 11:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
undertaker
why in the wrold did you erase my stuff i wrote. it was perfectly fine. can you please just tell me so that i wont get mad.
Thedeadmanandphenom 19:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Signed, THE DEADMAN
- wow, I'm sorry if I offended you. Never thought about it that way. Hey, so who's your favorite wrestler? Great Khali's mine.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedeadmanandphenom (talk • contribs)
Mark Copani
That was my fault, I initially thought someone was citing a Usenet newsgroup and did not realize it was just an alternative trade magazine. Burntsauce 20:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
3O
Both you and Burntsauce (talk · contribs) appear to be in a dispute in the article on Stacy Keibler. I have not looked into the matter but I have a lot of respect for both of you. Do you believe you can resolve the issue between the two of you or would you like me to provide a third opinion? Again, I have not yet looked into the issue. I will point you to WP:BLP which may be the appropriate policy here. --Yamla 20:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- There's no dispute, and we're currently working it out. All is well :-). Bmg916Speak 20:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- The notability of Stacy Keibler is not contested (she is definitely notable), the issue is the massive amount of uncited text. My primary concern is that the article contains inaccuracies and no sources are available to be fact checked, but that is all. Burntsauce 20:56, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
-
- Okay. Give me a shout if you two can't resolve it. I have no doubt you are quite capable of doing so. --Yamla 20:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
I had a right to be pissed off,
I just lost 6 refs when he rv'ed back there! What a destructive wanker, Burntsource is seriously destructive and should be banned. Govvy 21:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Not my fault, when you have someone who is abusing the system, fails to really hold down the rules of WP:BIO then failing etiquette of WP:PW. Coming up with adverse rules to adverse conditions, not accessing Wikiprojects talk pages and failing to be constructive in a respectable manner is destructive. Deserves to be banned. Govvy 21:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Texas Red
I've put in a protect request for The Undertaker, I notice that you've been reverting, hopefully we can lock it up for a couple of days, I know it's giving me a headache. Darrenhusted 22:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
It's been, rather.. ahem.. busy lately.. so no big deal about missing it.. I was surprised by the amount of people who supported me. Really cool.. I had to be argued into accepting the nom! *grin*.. What was with Govvy's last few statements, if you know.... if I didn't know better.. well you know. 03:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Trolling
Sorry bout that! I think we both went to do the same thing at the same time. I am having a discussion with the editor in question right now! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
TNA
yeah sorry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgallen1991 (talk • contribs)
Semi-protected
Give you a break from the JB IP's hopefully ;) SirFozzie 18:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. Could you do me a favor? Talk:Professional_wrestling_aerial_techniques. Could you help mediate this so bad feelings don't get out of control? I've put in my 2 cents, but things are rough enough as it is. SirFozzie 18:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Randy Orton and undertaker Feud
on the article, The Undertaker, you have some information of the feud between undertaker and orton but you forgot to include one big part of it. The time in Smackdown! when Randy Orton and his dad were on the arena with the casket of the fake undertaker and orton talking about his whole "i beat the undertaker mentally". In that casket was no fake Undertaker but the real thing and later when orton kneeled down to see in the "FAKE UNDERTAKER" was really "Fake", Undertaker arose and gave orton a chokeslam and threw him inside the casket. This is a major part of the whole feud when the maniken was actually real, becasue this tormented Orton and hid dad throughout the whole feud and reserection.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedeadmanandphenom (talk • contribs)
Thedeadmanandphenom
McPhail
what is your opinion, on mcphail?
Hype-TDB 18:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Sara Calaway
This is Thedeadmanandphenom again. Can you please visit the page Sara Calaway and tell me what's wrong and can you fix it for me? Thanks.
Thedeadmanandphenom 17:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
how do u get the wwe fan picture—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin Aguilar (talk • contribs)
Chris Benoit
Hey dude its me, (Atomic Religione) new name. Damm it, it couldnt beleive it, Chris Benoit is dead. What the hell is WWE going to do with their storyline now? Man, this is a blow to everybody. I almost feel as if i've lost a freind, since i've been folowing him since his days in ECW. Wretling has one big hurdle to overcome, with this one. RIP Benoit and his family. Thanks for hearing me out. --User:Fonzie77
Smackdown vs Raw 2008
Who gets the information about the venues, roster and songs tell me who it is asap.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin Aguilar (talk • contribs)
Hi
The Hybrid 20:31, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
