User talk:BlueGold73

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] QEBH

Thanks for your efforts to clean up QEBH. The article previously sucked. You've really improved it. I wish they were were a little more forthright in members. Right now it looks very provincial. Thanks again! Americasroof 04:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Mizzou

 Hello, I noticed you've made edits to University of Missouri articles or that you are in some way connected to the University of Missouri. I thought you might want to become a member of the Mizzou WikiProject. We've recently built the project page and started a drive to improve Mizzou related articles. Please take a look to edit an article or add one of your own. Once an article's status has been agreed upon, feel free to stop by and lend a hand in getting it to featured article status. Hope you can participate!



[edit] Theta Nu Epsilon Vandalism

Hi there, I noticed you have an interst in TNE. Watch out for the agenda taking place right now by the Alpha chapter to remove cited and verifiable info. They tend not to like Purdue- which has cited info that you can check for yourself- and they also do not like the whole TNE today section which they are desperately trying to remove- especially the sourced article about them being less like a secret society on campus. No one should allow sourced info to be removed on account that it does not suit the agenda or taste of a certain group. The current Alpha is a bully! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.141.156.118 (talk) 04:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I might suggest that the bad blood you are seeing on the TNE article is being generated primarily by an unreg. user sniping from several IP's into articles about Wesleyan University, TNE, and Middletown, Connecticut who has been previously blocked for similar disruptive behavior (see the IP talk page history [1] as they deleted the block message from the IP talk page). You may wish to report them if it continues and suggest blocks to their primary IP sockpuppets of abuse, 129.133.124.199 and 159.247.3.210 ; see also the talk pages of the articles mentioned above. I already went a round with this person at Middletown, Connecticut, so I'll be staying out of this one. Whew. --Pgagnon999 (talk) 16:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Blue Gold, this is Purdue and we have made our final statements for our case. We just wanted to be recognized under our proper name of Indiana Alpha, our proper founding date of 1882, and our connection to Purdue's own society Skull and Crescent. We don't care where we are recognized as such within the article- and we fully support your interests in adding as much verifiable and cited points as possible. We also appreciate your efforts to make the article more objective and not simply in the interst of the current Alpha group. We believe the TNE section today is a relevant section since there clearly are many issues surround chapters (either alive, sub rosa, or defunct) that are still relevant issues to the nature of TNE as a historical entity. Best Wishes, Purdue

TNE PAGE We are curious? Why was TNE's page altered to even remove your citations when there was no concensus by anyone from our side to do so? What is the block for if Wes Alpha will just revert. Look at their IP' talk pages- they have been running a muck with other Wesleyan related articles- that group is very controlling and problematic across the board. Best wishes, from Purdue people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.141.157.129 (talk) 03:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Good question. I would like to know the answer myself. That sort of behavior is ridiculous, especially from someone with administrative responsibilities. Keep fighting the good fight to get some balance in this article instead of Alpha's one-sided slant. BlueGold73 (talk) 03:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] For your work

The Missouri Barnstar National of Merit -
For all your work on Mizzou, Missouri and Education related articles.-Grey Wanderer | Talk 19:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:BannisterComplex.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BannisterComplex.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 12:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] North-American Interfraternity Conference

BlueGold73, I appreciate your edits, however, I have made a few modifications to them. Please refer to the discussion page and post a response if you disagree with my edits. LittleAlien¹8² --talk trash-- 20:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)