User talk:BlueEyedCat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello BlueEyedCat! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Wikisigbutton.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Khoikhoi 06:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Contents

[edit] Commenting your edits

Please describe your edits in edit summaries. When you are deleting large pieces, please explain your actions in talk pages, especially when dealing with controversial topics. Otherwise this may well be considered vandalism. `'mikkanarxi 17:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Please consider yourself warned of vandalism for the Van, Turkey, Artvin, and Kars articles. Serouj 02:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stop removing information

Please stop. This is your last warning. pschemp | talk 04:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm not removing informaiton. In fact i really wonder if you ever had read my edits.--BlueEyedCat 06:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

BlueEyedCat which articles are you talking about and what changes did you make? Don't care about those guys' "last warnings". We can discuss and share our ideas but first I have to know what changes you want to make. Saygılarımla, Deliogul 10:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Dear BlueEyedCat, Please calm. Make your edits without ignoring attacks to you, but please refrain edit-rv wars and personal attack. From now on I added you in my watchlist and I will be ready for help when you need.Regards.MustTC 10:46, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
I am sorry it took me some time to reply. What I would suggest is to start by small edits and slowly work your way up. That way other editors will get to know you better, so that they will take you more seriously. And you can also learn the dynamics of Wikipedia. I am just saying that there is a tendency to provide quick fixes to certain articles, but remember that it might take weeks to change a sentence in certain articles. Also avoid looping discussions that might not get anywhere, simply be realistic. The least stressful way of contributing to Wikipedia is to find some "neutral" or "not hot" articles and edit them, and occassionally slug it out in articles with POV problems. If not, you can get both stressed, and nothing will change in the articles. If there is anything that I can help out with, just leave me a message. Unfortunately WikiProject Turkey is not very functional at the moment, so there is not much coordination to be done. Hopefully I will be able to do something about WPTR soon. Cheers!Baristarim 20:26, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Türk Kahvesi

Your changes seemed somewhat POV and unecessary to me. I'm not sure what the problem is about having the legend is—it's not even stating it as a fact, it's just saying that there's a legend that exists. As for "byzantine coffee", you might want to see this, which states:

On the second case, the act of drinking coffee has generated trips of coffee-service usually in commercial areas: a man or a woman serve clients (shop keepers) within a commercial area bringing a very fine blended coffee in small cups, called "turkish coffee" or "greek coffee" or "byzantine coffee".

Finially, I don't understnad what the point is in saying, "Though it's generally known as Turkish Coffee..." The title of the article is already Turkish coffee, so I think that makes it pretty obvious. Khoikhoi 02:08, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked for 24 hours for continuing to remove information from articles without discussion or reason which is highly disruptive. Edits include diffs like this. Please rethink your editing strategy. pschemp | talk 02:20, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Dear BlueEyedCat, please first leave a note on the talk pages of the articles that you want to make changes and then wait for some other people to leave some comments about your offers for a day or two. It's hard to make Wikipedians believe in you but don't worry. Kendine iyi bak ;) Deliogul 11:11, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mutlu Yıllar

Onlar da Yeniyıl tatili ister Yeniyılınız kutlu olsun MustTC 15:27, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Onlar da Yeniyıl tatili ister
Yeniyılınız kutlu olsun
MustTC 15:27, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Revert wars

Please stop reverting without explanations of your actions and without discussions. Further pattern of this kind of editing will probably makes you blocked. `'mikka 02:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR Nasreddin Article

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 20:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nasreddin article, 3R rule.

It's not me but you who had deleted information from the article. If you consider that it was first you who had reverted my edits, than you would realize how funny to leave a message in my talk page about 3R rule. However, i'm open to discussions about the article. Please explain why you have removed my referenced information from the article ?

PS. You've once accused me to act like vandal in one of your edit explanations. I will be happy if you manage to refrain from personal attacks, esp to me.--BlueEyedCat 11:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

BTW, i've recently re-read the article and i find your last edits reasonable. I'm mostly fine with the current status of the article. (I've added some data about where he was born and lived)--BlueEyedCat 11:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
You been served with 3RR since you been in the breach of such a policy. Please check the records. With regard to your statement, I have not removed the citations that you have provided, but reinstated in a scholarly manner, than POV Pushing (please see: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy. However, Vandalism is not a personal attack but a Wikipedia policy which is being observed by Wikipedians. However, I am more than happy to disuses this matter further, in relevant discussion page for future arbitrations, if required. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 11:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
All the edits are welcome, as long as are supported by reputable sources (not Turkish Ministry of Culture, since they have the habit of calling everyone Turk; i.e. Parthians, Scythians, ancient Anatolians etc.) ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 11:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
BTW: Although Turkish Ministry of Culture, does not consider as a neutral source, but I have NOT removed the citation. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 11:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Entries removed

I have removed a small section of your edits, since does not correspond with the citation that you have provided – and even differs. However, I have moved it to Talk:Nasreddin, and if you have another citation, to support the claim, by all means please reinstall it back to the article page. But please do not RV it, since there are further edits by other contributors. Thanks. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 05:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)