From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
??? |
This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. |
Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
|
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
- If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
|
[edit] Featured Article?
How come Redshift is an featured article while this one is a stub? Isn't it the same phenomenon only that they are each others opposites? Perhaps a merge? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.228.228.224 (talk • contribs)
- The Redshift article is extremely well-sourced, and has lots of illustrations and context. A merge would not be a bad idea. --Kuzaar-T-C- 11:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- It is strange anyway. People must prefer red over blue or something :P. Soon2Bregistered 81.228.228.224 17:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps because this article isn't currently very good? ErkDemon 02:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I added a little bit about the limit to blue shift, makes the article a little bit better I think. Feel free to elaborate.--MaizeAndBlue86 (talk) 00:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)