Blue Banana

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ˌ

The Blue Banana (also known as the Hot Banana, European Megalopolis or European Backbone) is a discontinuous corridor of urbanisation in Western Europe. It stretches approximately from north west England in the north to Milan in the south. The curvature of this corridor (hence the "banana" in the name) takes in cities such as Brussels, Amsterdam, Cologne, Frankfurt, Leeds, London, Basel, Turin, Milan and Zurich, and covers one of the world's highest concentrations of people, money, and industry.^[1]. The concept was developed in 1989 by RECLUS, a group of French geographers managed by Roger Brunet.^[2] Around 90 million people live within the Blue Banana.

Contents 1 List of cities and regions 2 History 3 Criticism 4 Implications 5 Development 6 See also 7 References

[edit] List of cities and regions

The cities in the table below, include their greater urban areas. Liverpool, for example has below 500,000 inhabitants; the greater urban area (Merseyside), however, has around 1.3 million.

City / Metropolitan Area	Country	Number of Inhabitants (millions)
Liverpool / Merseyside	England	1.3
Manchester - Salford / Greater Manchester	England	2.5
Leeds - Bradford / West Yorkshire	England	2.2
Sheffield / South Yorkshire	England	1.5
Birmingham - Wolverhampton / West Midlands	England	2.6
London commuter belt	England	12.0
Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai	France & Belgium	1.8
Flemish Diamond	Belgium	5.5
The Randstad	Netherlands	7.4
Brabantse Stedenrij	Netherlands	1.7
Arnhem-Nijmegen	Netherlands & Germany	0.8
Euregion Gronau-Enschede	Netherlands & Germany	3.2
Meuse-Rhine	Belgium, Netherlands, & Germany	3.9
Rhine-Ruhr	Germany	12.0
Frankfurt Rhein-Main	Germany	5.2
Mannheim Rhein-Neckar	Germany	2.0
Saarbrucken-Forbach	Germany & France	0.7
Strasbourg	France	0.7
Stuttgart	Germany	2.7
Basel	Switzerland, France & Germany	0.7
Zürich	Switzerland	1.3
Milan	Italy	7.5
Turin	Italy	2.2
TOTAL	-	77.4

[edit] History

The French geographer Roger Brunet, who wished to subdivide Europe into "active" and "passive" spaces, developed the concept of a West European "backbone" in 1989. He made reference to an urban corridor of industry and services stretching from northern England to northern Italy. Brunet did not see it as a new discovery, but as something easily predictable to anyone with "a little bit of intelligence and a feel for spatial properties."

He saw the Blue Banana as the development of historical precedents, e.g. known trade routes, or as the consequence of the accumulation of industrial capital. France, in his view, lost its links to the corridor as a result of its persecution of minorities (viz. the Huguenots) and excessive centralisation in Paris. In his analysis, Brunet artificially disconsidered the French conurbations, which are particularly narrowly concentrated around Paris, in order to persuade French authorities of the necessity of greater integration of business into the centre of Europe.

The name was added by the media: the banana shape was pointed out at a press-conference by Jacques Chérèque, a government minister; the colour was that given to it by an artist at the Nouvel Observateur, in an article by Josette Alia three days later which baptised the banane bleue.

—Roger Brunet

It is said that the banana was rendered as blue, because it represented the core of Europe, and the European flag is largely blue. Other sources claim that the colour refers to the clothing of industrial workers ("blue collar").

Its existence is sometimes attributed to the redrawing of the map of Europe after World War II, which led to the creation of a North-South axis (of which the highly-developed infrastructure of the Rhine valley provides an example), while East-West relationships were enfeebled. On the other hand, large centres already existed long before that time (Randstad, the Ruhr, Manchester) so that it was only natural that development would occur in areas that lay between these powerhouses, and that large populations would follow.

[edit] Criticism

The term, because of its simplicity and memorability, was rapidly adopted by the media, and became subject to promotional manipulation. Local authorities within the Blue Banana tried to redefine it as the best place for business investment. This gave other interested parties good reason to blur the boundaries to include regions they wished to promote. This was the opposite of Brunet's intention.

Detractors have pointed out that similar corridors of importance can be found along the Danube and on the Baltic and Mediterranean coasts, and that conurbations exist around Berlin and Warsaw. More importantly, the Blue Banana includes vast tracts of sparsely populated area (the North Sea and the Alps), and does not take into account the difficulties that have been experienced by Belgium, Lorraine, the Ruhr, and Sarre in trying to adjust to economic changes.

[edit] Implications

The Blue Banana holds an economically advantageous position through its population density, which is at an urban level for long stretches; and its infrastructure, although more industrial than IT in character, is above average throughout. While Europe possesses only a few true metropolises (Paris, Moscow and London), such centres are only important to the extent to which they further cooperative work and allow interdependent industries to lie in close proximity.

The region is also of interest to multinational companies, not only for its good transport infrastructure, e.g. ports (Rotterdam, Antwerp) or airports (in London, Frankfurt, Amsterdam, etc), but also for its convenience as a centre of operations. Furthermore, the region contains the main offices of several international organisations, such as the International Court in the Hague, the European Parliament in Strasbourg, and NATO headquarters in Brussels.

The more southerly Golden Banana is known for its modern industries, such as electronics, aeroplane manufacture, and research centres, and could in the future become the European counterpart of Silicon Valley and the factories of South East Asia. The reunification of Germany in 1990 saw large subsidies being directed towards former socialist countries in the east, which nevertheless did not result in the developments that had been hoped for.

[edit] Development

Brunet's intention was to criticise French policies, and his ideas were taken on board, so that today the Blue Banana model is no longer accurate: the former conurbations have grown several new branches, including one stretching from Paris to southern Spain, and in fact the last few years have seen so much expansion that one might speak of a "Blue Star" — although the Blue Banana remains at its core. New regions that have been compared to the Blue Banana can be found on the Mediterranean coast between Valencia and Genoa, as part of the Golden Banana, or "European Sunbelt", paralleling that of America (where a pleasant climate draws newer industries), and in the north of Germany, where another conurbation lies on the North Sea coast, stretching into Denmark and from there into southern Scandinavia.

The massive influx of foreign immigrants, who move by preference to the more prosperous, densely-inhabited regions, has resulted in a disequilibrium in growth that is so severe that it may lead to polarisation within Europe, and a fragmentation into "winners" (inhabitants of the Blue Banana) and "losers" (rural areas, remote towns, and Eastern Europe in general). The most serious problems lie with the people in outlying regions, who face a vicious circle of administrative neglect and gradual depopulation, thus becoming increasingly dependent. In addition, the fact that high-speed train services are only viable in wealthy and heavily-populated areas means that peripheral towns face yet more competitive disadvantages in comparison to urban centres.

[edit] See also

• Flemish Diamond
• Golden Banana

[edit] References