User talk:Blorg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Photos contributed to Wikipedia

User talk:Blorg/Photos

[edit] Archives

User talk:Blorg/Archive1

[edit] Thanks

Hi- Thanks for the good work.David Justin 23:03, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

That's a good point. I'll begin working on it.David Justin 00:09, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


That's a great idea. Thanks.David Justin 15:22, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sarmite Bulte

Hello,

You Asked Me whether Sarmite Bulte Gets to Keep the Title of "The Honourable" after She Leaves Parliament, Well As She was Sworn in as a Member of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada in 2004 She is Entitled to Use the Prefix "The Honourable" and the Post Nominal Letters "PC" for Life. ... Hope That Clears Up Some of the Confusion Michael Drew 18:02, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Goldwasser

I was scratching my head for a moment there. Anyway, it's time to watch Scotland slaughter England. SilkTork 17:31, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tuttle: "forgotten in a week."

I could not help noticing, that the auspicious "one week" mark was passed last friday. Of course, when you wrote that, you had no idea that Mr. Taylor would write to THe Register, and ask them, in their hyperbolic words, to "shut down the internet." And now comes the wonderful story in the Tuttle Times: "[CentOS is] a free operating system that this guy gives away, which tells you how much time he’s got on his hands.”

In all fairness, you may not be far off. It will, perpaps, be forgotten in two weeks. But meanwhile, I just wanted to share this development. It had me laughing for a good fifteen minutes. Then again, it is winter in Alaska, so I am easily amused. --VonWoland 03:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

I've been following it all right, and I saw that Register article (although the "shut down the internet" headline was somewhat misleading IIRC.) So it has made the Tuttle Times! Must check that out... -- Blorg 18:48, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Insalata Caprese

The image you uploaded is much clearer, so thanks! As a minor point, since you created the image yourself would you consider releasing it under a Creative Commons license (such as {{cc-by-sa-2.0}} or {{cc-by-2.0}} instead of the GFDL? These allow you to retain your rights in a similar way to the GFDL, but don't require people seeking to use your images to include a full copy of the rather hefty licence text with every instance. GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 11:02, 2 August 2006 (UTC)