Talk:Blood blister

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Medicine This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the doctor's mess.
Start This page has been rated as start-Class on the quality assessment scale
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance assessment scale

[edit] Clean up

To do list:

  • Lists should be removed and their information should be better woven into the article
  • Quotes should be paraphrased.

See Wikipedia:Manual of Style --24fan24 22:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Just made a few edits... "Big" versus "Large", I feel that "Large" is more encyclopaedic... Also, I don't believe a report on how the blood blister healed is -truly- necessary for the article.

71.235.66.254 02:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Do we really need five pictures of blood blisters in this article? ~C. Hall

[edit] How To???

The first part of the Treatment section reads an awful lot like a how-to from my perspective. Does anyone else see it the same way? Elevate, epsom salts, etc. I'm not too sure it adds anything of merit to the article, but I'm also not sure on what can be done to improve this portion. Rookie Rover 12:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


I agree it does sound like a "how to" and it is hard to change, how about removing the bullet points and summarising into something like this:

"There are several popular methods used in the treatment of blood blister, these include elevating the injured area, applying padding and soaking in epsom salts."

It gives the treatments without truning it into a how toGbarnes 5 16:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Definitely needs work. Most material is uncited and therefore of questionable accuracy. This article needs medical citations, not home-remedies.Halogenated (talk) 22:34, 29 November 2007 (UTC)