User talk:Blm0303

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Blm0303, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Max and Ruby have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Toddst1 (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Notability of MyPartner

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on MyPartner, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because MyPartner is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting MyPartner, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of MyPartner.com

A tag has been placed on MyPartner.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 17:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Backyardigans, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Max and Ruby

You should probably take a look through Wikipedia:Citing sources. Frankly it was a marginal revert on my part so I'll undo it. It's clear you're trying to edit in good faith. Can you add a reference to the article using the <ref> </ref> tags? Toddst1 (talk) 15:46, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] MyPartner.com

A tag has been placed on MyPartner.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of MyPartner.com and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 16:18, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

I can provide another copy. It'll be with you in a minute or so at User:Blm0303/myPartner. Rudget. 21:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Y Done. See the blue link immediately above this. Rudget. 21:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

{{helpme}} -- I did contest it with why. Got a nasty comment from somebody called anyonmous, responded, and then the page was deleted. I just need to know how to make the page stick. I used what I thought was Wikipedia "notable" sources and include in the article and talk page why this site is notable. I asked for this help in the talk page before it was deleted. Whatever changes need to be made, I am willing to make to get this page to stick. Thanks for any help anyone can give me. I am new at this and any direction would be greatly appreciated.

The problem is that the article reads a bit like a puff piece. See the blue link above from Rudget for a copy of the article. I think if you rewrote it to be more neutral and read less like advertising, it wouldn't be speedily deleted again. If this isn't helpful, please restore the {{helpme}} template to its previous state. Good luck with fixing that article. If you really think it doesn't meet the criteria here, you can protest the deletion here, but be ready to give a thorough explanation, and be sure to familiarize yourself with our policies and guidelines surrounding deletion and content (you should consider reading the other policies and guidelines too, but you don't have to. Reading the deletion related ones is helpful, though). --Thinboy00 @117, i.e. 01:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)


{{helpme}} I finally got this page to stick for 2 months. It is not blatant advertising. I had other people check it to make sure it wasn't reading that way. Now, it is getting deleted and when I asked the editor why I was told that it was deleted because it was deleted before. Well, that doesn't seem right. It is a complete rewrite and it was okay for 2 months. Thank you for any help.

The recent re-deletion (last night) of MyPartner was a re-direct to an article that had been deleted a long time ago. It was not an existing article TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 05:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

{{helpme}} I know the redirect was deleted. I had a page for myPartner.com up. I redirected myPartner to it. I want to understand why the myPartner.com was deleted. Being told that it was deleted before as the reason seems less than fair. It wasn't deleted a long time ago. It was deleted two days ago. The page had been up for almost two months without any problems.Blm0303 (talk) 17:22, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Jangl

A tag has been placed on Jangl, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 02:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Additions of http://.onlinepersonalswatch.typepad.com

Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.--Hu12 (talk) 23:28, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from all of Wikipedia.--Hu12 (talk) 09:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Please help me. This is not a spam link. I explained to you that this site/owner is an expert in the field which, in my opinion, would make it a notable source. Please let me know if this assumption I made was wrong. What more do I have to show you to prove that it is a notable source? Other sites have interviews in the external links. I don't understand why this is an issue? Again, these links were put up like a month ago and only now there is a problem. I don't understand!! Also, how do you want me to fix myPartner.com? I am still waiting on a response for that. It wasn't blatant advertising for over a month and now it is. Understand that is very confusing not does it tell me what needs to be fixed since you are the only editor with an issue with it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Blm0303 (talk • contribs) 04:50, 1 May 2008

Of your roughly 50 article space contributions 19 involve adding the same links to the same site, onlinepersonalswatch.typepad.com. You are infact in violation of the following, Wikipedia is not a vehicle promotion: see:
--Hu12 (talk) 05:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your response back. Like I said, he is an expert in the social networking and online dating fields. I saw that other wiki pages like POFs had interviews in external links from notable sources. I did not release that because I linked to the articles of the CEOs of these companies that would be an issue. I would think people would want to read what the CEOs have to say. So linking to any external interviews is a no-no? So am I not allowed to link to onlinepersonalswatch.com at all? (just so I am clear here)

[edit] Hi

I recommend you try Wikipedia:Deletion review if you want a conclusive discussion regarding the notability of MyPartner.Com. Best, Moreschi (talk) (debate) 12:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)