Talk:BLEU

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article BLEU has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.

Contents

[edit] Good Article Nomination

Good evening (GMT time); I have reviewed this article on 00:07, Wednesday June 10, 2008 (UTC) in accordance with the Good Article (GA) criteria. I have concluded that, in my opinion, the article has failed one or more categories and is therefore denied GA status. In order to provide constructive criticism, I have below listed one or more of my reasons for failing the article, beside the relevant criteria title; this should be taken as advice for improvement, rather than a list of reasons for failing.

  1. Well-written: Failed (Primary reason)
"...It does not seriously violate the standards in Wikipedia Manual of style, in particular .. Jargon..."
  1. Factually accurate: Pass
  2. Broad: Pass
  3. Neutrally written: Pass
  4. Stable: Pass
  5. Well-referenced: Pass
  6. Images: Fail
"...has images where possible..."

My condolences to the lead editors - your hard work has been informally recognised; just keep it up, and do not be disheartened!

Feel free to renominate the article when the above improvements have been made, or alternatively seek a GA Review or discuss my decision at my talk page if you believe I have been misguided.

Sincerest regards,
anthonycfc [talk] 06:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] oops missing info?

"This is illustrated in the following example from," from where? --Ling.Nut 16:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Well spotted. This example is from Papineni 2002. I've noted this. - Francis Tyers ยท 16:47, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] No pronoun antecedent

There are a number of 3rd person plural pronouns in the Performance section which have no obvious antecedent--e.g. "they highlight". Perhaps a sentence has been left out referring to a study by some researchers? Or is it one of the footnoted references, and if so, which one? Mcswell (talk) 23:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA/R ended

In accordance with the WP:GA/R over this article, in a 3 to 1 vote, it has been listed as a WP:GA. Review archived in GA/R archive 15. Homestarmy 15:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)