User talk:Blankfrackis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Blankfrackis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Jeff3000 00:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] link to British

Hello, when you want to link to the article about something British, please do not link to British, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as United Kingdom, Great Britain or British English by writing out [[United Kingdom|British]] or [[Great Britain|British]]. Regards, Jeff3000 00:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism warning

You've sent me a message warning me for vandalism for deleting an item from my talk page. I was not aware that deleting something from your discussion page on your profile was classed as vandalism. This is not an encyclopedia entry, it's the talk page on my own profile and what was deleted was a specific piece of information that someone had given me which is no longer relevant. Why is this classed as vandalism? blankfrackis 16:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Probably a mistake from me, my apologizes. Artaxiad 16:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Vandalism Warning

Sorry about that, the reason I reverted the changes you made to your page was because you were not logged on to your own account when you (identified only by your IP) removed content from your talk page. It helps if you sign on first before making changes to your account! --Nevhood 01:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] extreme POV and dishonest referencing warning

Your addition at phimosis is not a universally accepted fact, and the reference did not support your assertion. Whether this was carelessness or deliberate dishonesty, do not replace it unless you can offer stronger evidence from the medical literature, not simply an unreferenced patient advice column that does not support your assertion. I will warn you that trying to restart the circ wars here will be a quick route to being banned. alteripse 23:35, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't see what relation the point I added to the article has to "circ wars", the contested position that BXO is one of the primary causes of phimosis has nothing to do with opinions on the merits of circumcision as far as I'm aware. Blankfrackis 19:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mosaic law

Hi! You had written a comment on Talk:Halakha objecting to making Mosaic law a redirect to Halakha. I wanted to let you know about two options available to you: You can add an entry to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion objecting to this redirect. Or if you'd like, you can create a new article entitled e.g. Mosaic law (Christianity) addressing the subject as a concept in Christian theology. I looked at the history of the Mosaic law article from before it was made a redirect and it looks to me like the article had always described the subject from a Jewish perspective and generally said very little, so it looks like the sort of article you described has never been written and perhaps you might want to write or at least start it. Best, --Shirahadasha 21:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC)