User talk:Bladeswin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

After two comments, I now find it necessary to make this crystal clear right here at the top of my Talk Page. I am not an admin. I use the speedy tags because I neither have, nor want the admin power to speedily delete the pages. Also: I make mistakes. Such is the way of humanity. If I make a mistake, a kind note will go further than hate. One more thing, a comment was made as to the speed at which I tag things... Well, I use Special:Newpages to clear out the junk...and there are tons of junk new pages.

These are the talk articles from October 1, 2006 to the present.
All previous messages may be found here.


Contents

[edit] marist high school

this page is currently underconstruction, it was a fluke that it was like that, sorry about that.

[edit] Skyscrapercity.com

This article was requested. Besides, it is one of the most important internet forums dealing with the topic of skyscrapers, architecture and urbanism, so there is no reason to dismiss it as "non-notable". Uaxuctum 05:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

OK, I've just read your justification. Anyway, I do not agree, I think you should change the speedy deletion into a Request for Deletion. SSC is a notable forum among those dealing with the topics it deals and has a wide worldwide user-base, so there are arguments in favor of keeping it that I think merit at least discussion. Uaxuctum 05:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sanjeev Murali Mohan

Am creating this page and will be updating it shortly. Is meant to be humorous, but if its not suitable, kindly go ahead and delete the same. Ramanbnv

[edit] Joanie4Jackie

Dear Bladeswin:

I have just barely finished typing and you have already selected this article for deletion. It must have been up for all of ten seconds, I'm suprised you even had time to read it. I would object to your deleting this article on the grounds that several notable women filmmakers were involved with it: Miranda July, Sarah Jacobson, Lisa Hammer, G.B. Jones and Tammy Rae Carland. All these women have pages on Wikipedia: it follows that if they are notable, so is their work, especially on a collaborative project of this scope, ranging over a period of years.

I would like to know why you consider this page deleteable and I would also like the opinion of a few other administrators who, I believe, would find this subject notable.

Intheshadows 03:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. I appreciate your response and do understand that there must be many "junk" pages to edit on Wikipedia. I wasn't aware there was a 'New Pages' section, which explains a lot. Good luck with your work on Wikipedia!

Intheshadows 07:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Psyber

Greetings Bladeswin

Responding to your request to delete the Psyber terminology that is a part of the Cyberpunk and online community terminology.

Being new here and seeing other terms here such as Cyber, Cyberspace, noobs and such, which is all tied in with the Cyberpunk and online community and subculture, I felt Psyber which is a structured term involved with this online society would be a valid input to be tied in with the Cyberpunk terminology and structure that exists here in the Wikipedia

I followed the instructions to contest deletion, however if I have “broken” any rules it is not intentionally.

Your original comment for deletion is, that this is not a dictionary, I have modified the Psyber to reflect how it is tied in with the Cyberpunk grouping so as to better fit your formatting requests, Though I am not completely sure what your formatting requirements are.

Any feed back on this would be helpful to help comply with your requirements for me to contribute to the Wikipedia. Thanks.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Psyberwolf (talk • contribs)

[edit] SmartDraw

I was wondering if you could clarify why you marked our SmartDraw article as not notable. I realize any editor at Wikipedia has to go through a lot of noise and junk to keep Wikipedia clean, but I don't think SmartDraw is any different than many other articles written about technical software. SmartDraw has been around for 12 years innovating different ways to allow regular business users to draw diagrams without technical or designer know how.

We've added references to some reviews of the older versions of the product and hopefully we will have some new reviews shortly. Just recently the US Department of Justice adopted SmartDraw Legal as their standard diagramming software. More than 10 million people have downloaded SmartDraw. SmartDraw's article is similar to pages like Visio and ConceptDraw as it discusses a specific software with its unique set of tools in a large and growing industry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Egaal (talk • contribs)

Well...I'm no expert on notability but I suspect that it is not notable. I'm yet to find a single source that is not a secondary resource - with the exception of the smartdraw website and select few others with financial reasons to endorse and market this program. Everything seems to point back there. The point of origin for the statistics seems to be the smartdraw homepage's press releases. The US DOJ adopted Smartdraw Legal as their "standard diagramming software"? I'm not so sure as Egaal. Sure, they supposedly own a lot of licenses for it but who says they paid for them? Ten million product downloads. Free products are products too! Maybe that's 99.99% of their product downloads - upgrades, trial versions, compos etc. Ten million downloads doesn't mean ten million people have purchased licenses. "More than 10 million people" Why write this on your page? Because, you apparently marked the article as not notable and I think you were probably right. I've seen the work you've done on some other articles and I wonder if you have some brilliant idea about how to determine for once and for all... "Is Smartdraw notable? Is the smartdraw article written with a neutral point of view? Are the claims all verifiable?" and so on. Anyway thanks in advance. Really I don't have the commitment or motivation to work on wikipedia articles but this one is rather interesting. I look forward to hearing your thoughts. SneakyWho am i 07:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stubs (derived from Beau Taylor edit)

Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.

Thanks! Ksbrown 18:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Samsantiago

I saw that you prodded a number of articles by this fellow, all of which look to me like spam. Mind if I ask why you did not tag them db-spam? I started to, but you beat me to the punch. I think the prod is a waste of time, simply because the article's cannot be improved---they are just blatant advertising. ---Charles 05:29, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

To be honest, I didn't think ad was appropriate. It wasn't advertisement for a book far as I could find (google searched one of the titles got nothing), and it wasn't a bio because of the byline. It was Original Research however, which is specifically mentioned in Criteria for Non-Speedying as not a reason for speedying, but prodding. Therefore since I had (in my mind) eliminated speedying as an option, all that was left was prod. - Jake - Bladeswin | Talk to me | 05:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Ok, I guess it was just an assumption on my part that he was shilling for a book---those titles sound very much like book titles. I certainly meant no offense in asking the question. The sooner the articles are gone, the better. Thanks for your response. ---Charles 05:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
No prob. I wanted them gone too. I patrol Newpages more recently than I used to. I still have to figure out the best was to deal with garbage. - Bladeswin | Talk to me | 05:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
It can be damn frustrating, I will tell you that. I have been doing newpages patrol for quite some time now, and it can be infuriating. At other times, it is amusing. My advice would be not to lose your mind. Cheers! ---Charles 05:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. Always is frustrating to get edit conflicts! But...at least it shows that others care about newpages too. - J - Bladeswin | Talk to me | 05:45, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ice Hockey Project discussion of hockey player notability and project scope

Please come join the WikiProject Ice Hockey Notability standards for hockey players discussion. I'd like to see input from all our project members who have an opinion. Thanks! ColtsScore 00:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dear Bladeswin

Dear Bladeswin, I commend your zeal when searching for possible Candidates for Speedy Deletion. I friendly, and kindly suggest you, tho, to be a little more careful by checking what links to a potential candidate. You tagged Portal:Caribbean/Selected music/Layout as a test page, and thus, Portal:Caribbean and all its Music subpages showed up at WP:CSD. Like I said, I truly, really thank you for your obvious enthusiasm and work, and this is just a friend's advice :) Keep up the good work! Regards, Phaedriel - 06:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ugh

Please stop tampering with the Senate elections in 2008 by calling them bias, or you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Politics rulePolitics rule 20:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:FloridaEverbladesLogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:FloridaEverbladesLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. fuzzy510 02:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Message

Wow, I almost forgot you messaged me on here. I had no idea that the school uses the Wikipedia page. I have been doing ok. Classes are starting up once again and this semester is going to be a little tough for me but I'll survive. How have you been? Douglasr007 19:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #16

Number 16, May 3, 2008

The Hurricane Herald

This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers all of April 2008.

Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles.

Storm of the month

Typhoon Neoguri (2008)
Typhoon Neoguri on April 17

Typhoon Neoguri was the earliest tropical cyclone on record to strike China. It formed on April 13 to the east of the Philippines, and once entering the South China Sea, environmental conditions allowed for quick strengthening. Neoguri attained its peak intensity of 150 km/h (90 mph) as it approached the island of Hainan, though rapidly weakened due to unfavorable conditions. The system made landfall in southern China on April 19, causing three deaths and moderate damage totaling over ¥296 million (2008 RMB, $42 million 2008 USD). The typhoon left 40 fishermen missing in the South China Sea.

Other tropical cyclone activity

  • A weak tropical depression formed near New Caledonia in the South Pacific ocean early in the month, and another tropical depression developed in the basin later in the month.
  • Two named storms formed in the Australian region during the month, including Tropical Cyclone Durga, which was the first ever cyclone named by the Tropical Cyclone Warning Centre in Jakarta, Indonesia. Tropical Cyclone Rosie co-existed with Durga for much of its duration.
  • Cyclone Nargis developed in the North Indian Ocean late in the month, and reached its peak intensity early in May; further details will be covered in the next newsletter.

Member of the month

Cyclone barnstar

The April member of the month is VOFFA. Though not officially a project member, VOFFA is an important user to the project, having maintained and updated the talk page archives on tropical cyclones worldwide; activity includes adding warnings and discussions for all storms. The user is particularly active during the off-season of the Atlantic basin, when article activity on tropical cyclones typically declines.

Storm article statistics

Grade Jan Feb Mar Apr
Featured article FA 33 36 38 40
A 9 8 8 8
Good article GA 114 123 130 131
B 99 96 91 103
Start 214 216 211 208
Stub 3 6 9 9
Total 472 485 487 499
ω 2.98 2.96 2.94 2.92
percentage
Less than B		 46.0 45.8 45.2 43.5
percentage
GA or better		 33.1 34.3 36.1 35.9

Project News
There is discussion on the status of articles on non-notable storms in the Merging page of the project. Comments are welcome.

A Wikipedia traffic counter was launched earlier this year. In the month of February, the article on Hurricane Katrina was viewed just over 200,000 times, making the article the 496th most viewed article on the English Wikipedia during the month.

During the month, Hurricane Camille was demoted from GA status, continuing the trend of good articles degrading in status on notable storms; other occurrences include the FA removal of Cyclone Tracy and 1900 Galveston Hurricane. If anyone has any ideas how to fix the problem, feedback and ideas are appreciated.

♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:50, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #17

Number 17, June 7, 2008

The Hurricane Herald

This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers all of May 2008.

Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles.

Storm of the month

Cyclone Nargis
Cyclone Nargis

Cyclone Nargis was the costliest and deadliest natural disaster in the history of Burma (Myanmar). It formed on April 27 in the central Bay of Bengal, and after initially tracking north-northwestward it turned to the east. Quickly strengthening to reach peak winds of at least 165 km/h (105 mph), Nargis made landfall in the Ayeyarwady Division of Burma on May 2 near peak intensity. The cyclone killed at least 80,000 people and potentially over 300,000. Passing near the metropolis of Yangon, the cyclone destroyed thousands of buildings, and damage was estimated at over $10 billion (USD). In the wake of the storm, the ruling military junta of Burma initially refused foreign aid, and after they allowed foreign assistance, the government was criticized for its poor handling of the aftermath of the storm.

Other tropical cyclone activity

  • Northwestern Pacific Ocean – Typhoon Rammasun was the strongest tropical cyclone worldwide during the month, though it did not affect land. Tropical Storm Matmo formed east of Luzon in the middle of the month and lasted for three days. Severe Tropical Storm Halong (Cosme) was the deadliest storm in the Pacific basin, causing 58 deaths and $94 million (USD) in damage after hitting Luzon on May 17. At the end of the month, Typhoon Nakri formed and reached peak intensity over open waters before becoming extratropical in early June.
  • Eastern Pacific Ocean – Tropical Storm Alma was was the easternmost forming Pacific tropical cyclone on record. Forming from a trough on May 29, it became a strong tropical storm before making landfall near León, Nicaragua, killing at least two people.
  • 2008 Atlantic hurricane season– Tropical Storm Arthur formed from the remnants of Tropical Storm Alma as it made landfall on Belize, causing flash flooding and at least nine fatalities.

Project News
Several other languages are active in the realm of tropical cyclone articles, though as much as ours. The French Wikipedia has 76 storm articles, the Spanish Wikipedia has 99 storm articles, and the Portuguese Wikipedia has 116 storm articles. Each of the projects have several storm articles we do not have, and the coverage on non-notable storms outside of the Atlantic is better, particularly in the Southern Hemisphere.

During the month, User:Potapych finished working on Template:Infobox Hurricane Small, which is used for the small Infoboxes in season articles; he has updated several season article already with the changes.

Main Page content

Storm article statistics

Grade Feb Mar Apr May
Featured article FA 36 38 40 41
A 8 8 8 17
Good article GA 123 130 131 129
B 96 91 103 101
Start 216 211 208 209
Stub 7 9 9 9
Total 487 487 499 506
ω 2.96 2.94 2.92 2.88
percentage
≥Less than B		 45.8 45.2 43.5 43.1
percentage
≥GA or better		 34.3 36.1 35.9 367.0

Member of the month

Cyclone barnstar

The May member of the month is Juliancolton. Joining the project in November 2007, Julian has become an active member of the project, working on new articles in the Atlantic basin. He has created two featured lists (List of Maryland and Washington, D.C. hurricanes (1980–present) and List of New York hurricanes), and rewrote the article on 2006 Atlantic hurricane season, which became featured during May. Juliancolton is currently working on a featured topic for Hurricane Dennis and its effects by region.

♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:43, 8 June 2008 (UTC)