User talk:Black Eagle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thank you for experimenting with the page Hillary Rodham Clinton on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. abakharev 02:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Hillary Rodham Clinton article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Mangojuicetalk 02:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Hillary Rodham Clinton. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. MichaelMaggs 19:32, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's NPOV policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Hillary_Rodham_Clinton, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Furthermore, reinserting the same commentary multiple times may cause you to violate the three-revert rule, which can lead to a block. Sophrosune (talk) 23:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
My information about Hillary Rodham Clinton is true and correct. At this time, I think that Events will prove me correct, and your other writers wrong over the next two years.
[edit] Removing Speedy Delete Notice
Please don't remove speedy delete notices, as you did at Freshmen (magazine). Thanks! --TeckWizTalkContribs@ 22:10, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Freshmen (magazine), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —Pilotguy (ptt) 02:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Space Shots
I've nominated Space Shots, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Space Shots satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Shots and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Space Shots during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. RJASE1 Talk 05:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:SPACE_SHOTS_producerwww.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:SPACE_SHOTS_producerwww.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. RJASE1 Talk 02:23, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
