Talk:Blattabacteriaceae
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page certainly doesn't meet the criteria for patent nonsense. It is underdeveloped, but represents a genuine family of bacteria. My source is Bergey's Manual, 2001. I just don't feel like I've said anything that merits citation. The article deserves to stay so that it can be developed. Ninjatacoshell 23:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- The best thing to do is find some content to go with the (currently) single-sentence article, and cite that. Regards, — BillC talk 23:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] csd
Is that the only book that the term appears in?--eskimospy(talk) 23:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- There are eight PubMed papers about the Genus it contains, Blattabacterium:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Search&db=pubmed&term=blattabacterium&tool=fuzzy&ot=blattobacterium And, Bergey's is the reference manual for bacteriology. Just about any page dealing with bacteria will cite Bergey's manual. It is a definitive source. Ninjatacoshell 00:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Okay, sorry about that. I will remove the CSD tag.--eskimospy(talk) 00:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. I can see how the name can put you off. Ninjatacoshell 00:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, sorry about that. I will remove the CSD tag.--eskimospy(talk) 00:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)