Talk:Blake Harper
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not even his actual name, needless to say. Thus we are left with... what? --Wetman 06:57, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- There isn't, as far as I know, a single solitary reference on the Internet from which his real name can be gleaned. Bearcat 20:05, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- Don't know if this is still an issue (probably is), but I've met him and his name is indeed Peter Tiefenbach. I think I can find a source ... TAnthony 03:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- That's fine; the information is out there now (it wasn't so readily available in 2005). There does still seem, however, to be some disagreement about whether it's Tiefenbach or Tiefenback. Is that confirmable? (It should be noted that there's also a CBC Radio personality named Peter Tiefenbach, which does make a significant difference in the redirectability of those two titles. And I have no idea whether they're related to each other or not, though it'd be fascinating if they were.) Bearcat 00:52, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think I still have the piece of paper he wrote his number on, does that count? LOL. TAnthony 01:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- Heh...technically, no (original research), but I'm not gonna quibble about it :-) Bearcat 01:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- I was the one who originally posted his real name. I got it from TV Guide's review of the Naked Fame movie (Google it). They spelled it with an "h"... exactly how I posted it. --72.202.150.92 00:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- I checked that TV Guide article, but they spelled it wrong, with a "k". So I sourced the name with his IMDB.com bio page, which lists the name correctly.
- I was the one who originally posted his real name. I got it from TV Guide's review of the Naked Fame movie (Google it). They spelled it with an "h"... exactly how I posted it. --72.202.150.92 00:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Heh...technically, no (original research), but I'm not gonna quibble about it :-) Bearcat 01:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think I still have the piece of paper he wrote his number on, does that count? LOL. TAnthony 01:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- That's fine; the information is out there now (it wasn't so readily available in 2005). There does still seem, however, to be some disagreement about whether it's Tiefenbach or Tiefenback. Is that confirmable? (It should be noted that there's also a CBC Radio personality named Peter Tiefenbach, which does make a significant difference in the redirectability of those two titles. And I have no idea whether they're related to each other or not, though it'd be fascinating if they were.) Bearcat 00:52, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- Don't know if this is still an issue (probably is), but I've met him and his name is indeed Peter Tiefenbach. I think I can find a source ... TAnthony 03:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image
The image posted to this article has a commercial source's logo on it. Does Wikipedia have express written consent to use this copyrighted image? Bearcat 22:35, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Best of blake harper vhs.jpg
Image:Best of blake harper vhs.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)