Black Knights' Tango

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article uses algebraic notation to describe chess moves.
Black Knights' Tango
Image:chess zhor 26.png
Image:chess zver 26.png a8 rd b8 c8 bd d8 qd e8 kd f8 bd g8 h8 rd Image:chess zver 26.png
a7 pd b7 pd c7 pd d7 pd e7 pd f7 pd g7 pd h7 pd
a6 b6 c6 nd d6 e6 f6 nd g6 h6
a5 b5 c5 d5 e5 f5 g5 h5
a4 b4 c4 pl d4 pl e4 f4 g4 h4
a3 b3 c3 d3 e3 f3 g3 h3
a2 pl b2 pl c2 d2 e2 pl f2 pl g2 pl h2 pl
a1 rl b1 nl c1 bl d1 ql e1 kl f1 bl g1 nl h1 rl
Image:chess zhor 26.png
Moves 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 Nc6
ECO A50
Origin Friedrich Sämisch vs Carlos Torre Repetto, Baden-Baden 1925
Named after Black's first moves Nf6 and Nc6
Parent Indian Defence
Synonym(s) Mexican Defense or Kevitz-Trajkovic Defense
Chessgames.com opening explorer

The Black Knights' Tango, also known as the Mexican Defense or Kevitz-Trajkovic Defense, is a chess opening that begins 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 Nc6. This position can also be reached by transposition by 1.d4 Nc6. It originated in the 1920s, when it was played by both the Mexican grandmaster Carlos Torre (hence the name "Mexican Defense")[1], and the American master Alexander Kevitz (the "Kevitz" in "Kevitz-Trajkovic Defense"). After decades of disuse, it was revitalized by International Master Georgi Orlov, who has written two successful books on it, and rechristened it the "Black Knights' Tango." Thereafter, the opening was employed by a number of strong grandmasters, including Joel Benjamin, Larry Christiansen, and Alex Yermolinsky. Indeed, Yermolinsky has ventured it against the likes of Garry Kasparov. Although fairly uncommon, the "Tango" has a sounder positional basis than most other offbeat openings: Black develops quickly, has a flexible pawn structure, and is prepared to strike back in the center with 3...e5, or with ...e6 and ...d5. The opening has some distinct variations but it is highly transpositional, and may transpose to the King's Indian Defense, Nimzo-Indian Defense, Bogo-Indian Defense, Chigorin Defense, Ragozin System, and English Opening.

Contents

[edit] Possible continuations

[edit] 3.Nf3

Perhaps the most common move, preventing 3...e5. Black usually responds with 3...e6. Then White can play 4.Nc3 Bb4 (transposing to a Nimzo-Indian Defense); 4.a3, when Black can either play 4...d5 (reaching a kind of Queen's Gambit Declined or Ragozin System), or 4...d6, preparing ...e5; or 4.g3, when after 4...Bb4+, play will transpose to a Nimzo-Indian after 5.Nc3, or to a Bogo-Indian Defense after 5.Bd2 or 5.Nbd2.

[edit] 3.Nc3

This is also often seen. After the thematic 3...e5, White usually responds with 4.d5 (4.Nf3, transposing to an English Opening, is also possible) Ne7. Now play can continue in "Tango" fashion, for example with 5.Nf3 Ng6, or transpose to the King's Indian Defense with, for example, 5.Nf3 d6 6.e4 (6.Bg5!?) g6 7.Be2 Bg7 8.0-0 0-0, reaching the main line of the King's Indian by transposition. Another interesting but relatively unexplored idea is 3...e6, allowing White to play 4.e4 (other moves such as 4.d5, 4.Bg5, 4.a3, and 4.Nf3 are also possible), whereupon Black follows up with 4...d5. From that position, the main possibilities are 5.e5 (the main line), 5.exd5, 5.cxd5, and 5.Bg5. These possibilities can also be reached via transposition from the Flohr-Mikenas Variation of the English Opening (1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 e6 3.e4), although if Black wishes to play this way, the optimal move order is 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nc6.

[edit] 3.d5

This ambitious move is playable but rarely seen. Black normally responds with 3...Ne5. Then after 4.e4 (inviting 4...Nxe4?? 5.Qd4 winning a knight), Black struck back in the center with 4...Ng6 5.f4 e5 in the seminal game Sämisch-Torre, Moscow 1925.

[edit] Notes

[edit] References

  1. Georgi Orlov (1992), Black Knights' Tango, Batsford, ISBN 1879479036
  2. Georgi Orlov (1998),The Black Knights' Tango: Outwit Your Opponents from Move 2!, Batsford, ISBN 0713483490
Languages