User talk:Bjones

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas
2 Thanks for the Edit
3 Need for a "Plasticman Comedy/Adventure Show" Article
4 Thanks
5 Please help
6 Unspecified source for Image:Kes (Star Trek).jpg
7 Image:Hodes.jpg
8 Image tagging for Image:21_jellett.jpg
9 Image:Kes_(Star_Trek).jpg listed for deletion
10 Fair use rationale for Image:Auth_Chiang_05060312.jpg
11 Image:140120046X.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
12 Margaret Smith (comedian)
13 Fair use rationale for Image:294.gif
14 Redirect of Sam glaser
15 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nolde g.jpg
16 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mazeof DeathPaperbackLibrary1971.jpg
17 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Luck1.jpg
18 AfD nomination of Charles Monitor
19 Slaughter Swamp
20 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shade6.jpg
21 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:A9ccea7237b9961efd7fb...9f1d8d9bcd1c1ef1.jpg
22 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hazel0149.jpg
23 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Img197.jpg
24 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jalila cover 1.jpg
25 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lazkano.jpg
26 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Katuoja20041222 smax.jpg
27 8½ Souvenirs
28 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Martiniphono3.jpg
29 Ginnie Gardiner
30 Disputed copyright violation for Ken Field
31 Momofuku (album)

[edit] The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas

See the talk page. While I wouldn't be surprised that there are other children's books on the Holocaust, according to the Post, (2nd cite) it is the first one. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

I added a link on the talk page to a selective bibliography from the Holocaust Teacher Resource Center listing 23 other children's fiction books on the topic!--Orange Mike 14:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for the Edit

Thanks for adding that "Fictional Dogs" tag to that Article.

Hey, man...at least SOMEBODY other than myself even remembers that show.

To this day, I don't know if I looked forward to each episode strictly because of Mighty Man, or strictly because of Yukk!!!

Thanos777 00:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Need for a "Plasticman Comedy/Adventure Show" Article

I would've written one, but frankly the ONLY thing that I can remember about that show is the "Mighty Man" part.

In fact, until recently my faulty memory had me believeing that they had their own show...!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thanos777 (talk • contribs) 03:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Thanks

Hello, thanks for the article edits on FarsiTube. It's always helpful when a veteran of sorts helps out the newbies. Take care! --Wikilover99 01:54, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please help

I was just wondering what i can do to improve my article, so it doesnt get deleted, any advise would be appreciated. --filmstudent2004 13:44, 30 January 2007

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Kes (Star Trek).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kes (Star Trek).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 21:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Hodes.jpg

I've tagged this image as fair use and replaceable fair use since I seriously doubt it was made by the USGov. If you could provide a source to a .gov domain or to a source that explicitly states it is from the USGov, that would solve this issue. Otherwise, it must be deleted. Thanks. --tomf688 (talk - email) 03:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:21_jellett.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:21_jellett.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kes_(Star_Trek).jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kes_(Star_Trek).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 17:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Auth_Chiang_05060312.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Auth_Chiang_05060312.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 07:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:140120046X.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

I have tagged Image:140120046X.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Margaret Smith (comedian)

I see you created this article on Margaret. Where is she from exactly? Suburban Illinois doesn't explain much to me other than near one of the major cities of Illinois. Thanks for any assistance in this.--Kranar drogin 23:20, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:294.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:294.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

[edit] Redirect of Sam glaser

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sam glaser, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sam glaser is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sam glaser, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 15:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nolde g.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nolde g.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mazeof DeathPaperbackLibrary1971.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mazeof DeathPaperbackLibrary1971.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Luck1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Luck1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] AfD nomination of Charles Monitor

An editor has nominated Charles Monitor, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Monitor and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Slaughter Swamp

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Slaughter Swamp, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Slaughter Swamp. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shade6.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shade6.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:A9ccea7237b9961efd7fb...9f1d8d9bcd1c1ef1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:A9ccea7237b9961efd7fb...9f1d8d9bcd1c1ef1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hazel0149.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hazel0149.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Img197.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Img197.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jalila cover 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jalila cover 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lazkano.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lazkano.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Katuoja20041222 smax.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Katuoja20041222 smax.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] 8½ Souvenirs

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 8½ Souvenirs, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of 8½ Souvenirs. Deb (talk) 12:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi. The link to the TV programme is broken, and there is no evidence that it was 30 minutes or longer. Can you refer me to any other source? Deb (talk) 18:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I'll do some research this weekend. I'm optimistic.Bjones (talk) 18:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Martiniphono3.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Martiniphono3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ginnie Gardiner

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Ginnie Gardiner, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed copyright violation for Ken Field

The specified copyright violation URL for Ken Field does not exist or has been deleted. Please revert this article to its previous version. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.24.30.104 (talk) 05:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Correction: I see that the URL does still exist - I'm sorry. It should not, and it's deletion has been requested. Ken Field no longer teaches at this school. The bio at that URL was improperly copied from http://kenfield.org (which has a posted GNU public license). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.24.30.104 (talk) 05:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Momofuku (album)

A tag has been placed on Momofuku (album), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SimsFan^{Talk to Me • Commons} 16:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC)