Talk:Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
High	This article is on a subject of High-importance within WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.

[edit] Wikipedia - Wrong Again!

WTF? You people let anyone edit these pages? Mr. Bivens, Webster Bivens that is, was indeed charged with narcotics violations, but a U.S. Commissioner dismissed the charges. Moreover, the attorneys did not represent Mr. Bivens "pro bono" but, rather, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals appointed Stephen A. Grant at the appellate level.

Additionally, the trial court dismissed not only for lack of jurisdiction but also for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Indeed, whether or not Mr. Bivens stated a claim upon which relief could be granted was the ONLY question reviewed on appeal by the Second Circuit.

I won't even begin to address the other plethora of errors in this article.

Wikipedia: The shameless crack whore of questionable pseudo-knowledge.