Talk:Birds of the Faroe Islands
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Faroe Islands, a WikiProject related to the nation of Faroe Islands. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
Birds of the Faroe Islands is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. Please do not substitute this template. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
|
WikiProject Birds To-do:
|
|
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Birds of the Faroe Islands → List of birds of the Faroe Islands — To conform to the Naming Conventions. —Zvar 18:31, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Oppose - the article is not just the list, it is an article on birds with an appended list (though admittedly the list takes up most of the article). There is certainly scope for expanding the article. Maybe one solution, if the length of the list makes the article unbalanced, is to fork the article by moving just the list itself to the proposed new title while leaving the rest of the article in situ. Maias 07:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Strong support Naming conventions; the majority of the article is a list, so that's where it belongs. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 21:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 21:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
